> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student-Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Innovations-Small Icon

Innovations

Insights and commentary on higher education.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

An Affirmative-Action Success

By  Richard D. Kahlenberg
September 13, 2011

Many university leaders at selective institutions say they would love to admit more low-income and working-class students but complain that there simply aren’t enough qualified candidates who can do the work and succeed in rigorous academic programs.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Many university leaders at selective institutions say they would love to admit more low-income and working-class students but complain that there simply aren’t enough qualified candidates who can do the work and succeed in rigorous academic programs.

But last week, the Institute of Political Studies of Paris, a prestigious French university also known as Sciences Po, released a new study of its 10-year-old affirmative action program that suggests that a highly selective institution can substantially expand socioeconomic diversity and still graduate large numbers of students who go on to top careers.

Unlike American affirmative action programs, which tend to help under-represented minorities, the French approach provides a leg up in admissions to low-income and working-class students of all races. Under the program, Sciences Po recruited top students from 85 disadvantaged high schools who would not otherwise have qualified and provided them admission and generous financial aid. Students in the program, known as the “Priority Education Conventions,” now make up about 10 percent of the student body.

Coupled with economically disadvantaged students who are admitted through traditional routes, the program raised the proportion of students from “working class or underprivileged” backgrounds to 28.5 percent of the student body. This proportion is substantially higher than at many selective American institutions, where, at the top 146 institutions, only 10 percent of students on average come from the bottom two socioeconomic quartiles.

The Sciences Po study tracked the progress of 860 students who were part of the special program to see whether they performed well academically and whether they went on to good jobs. Critics had raised concerns that students admitted through the socioeconomic affirmative-action policy would struggle academically and that graduates would be seen as tainted and shunned by employers.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the research, conducted by sociologist Vincent Tiberj, found that students admitted through the socioeconomic affirmative action program “keep up or quickly catch up with their peers,” and the dropout rate was “marginal.” Moreover, the study found, “employers treated them either like their peers, or perhaps better.” Overall, the study concluded, “the students who were admitted through this program had more difficulties than their classmates in adapting to Sciences Po, but in the end the very large majority obtained their degrees and now are employed in ‘classic’ jobs for Sciences Po graduates.”

Adoption of the program at Sciences Po took the leadership of director Richard Descoings, who strongly believed that the institution needed to move beyond a student body marked by affluence. In the U.S., a few leaders, such as former Amherst College president Anthony Marx, have taken strong steps, but doing so can be seen as risky because any affirmative action program can mean lower median test scores and thereby lower rankings. What is to be done?

According to an innovative article by Vassar president Catherine Hill, institutions would likely be far more aggressive if socioeconomic diversity affected their rankings in U.S. News & World Report. Years ago, Bob Shireman and I met with U.S. News officials to consider socioeconomic diversity in rankings, and the magazine did agree to publish socioeconomic data about institutions. But the data are just informational and don’t affect the all-important rankings.

In a recent article, Hill moved the ball forward by outlining a simple but clever way to work socioeconomic diversity into the rankings. Just as U.S. News now looks at actual graduation rates compared with predicted graduation rates, so the rankings could compare the predicted socioeconomic diversity of an institution given its SAT selectivity level with the actual level of economic diversity. Some would exceed expectations and be rewarded in the rankings, others would lag and be punished. Institutional mission statements emphasize the importance of diversity; and financial aid often exceeds total faculty salaries, so why should U. S. News ignore this issue in the rankings, she asks?

The Sciences Po experiment suggests that in France the old excuse that there aren’t enough working-class students who are “college material” will no longer fly. Now all we need is some positive incentives for American colleges to take action the way Sciences Po did a decade ago.

Richard D. Kahlenberg
Richard D. Kahlenberg is an education- and housing-policy consultant and author of The Remedy: Class, Race, and Affirmative Action (Basic Books, 1996).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin