Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Innovations-Small Icon

Innovations

Insights and commentary on higher education.

The Gainful Employment Travesty

By Richard Vedder June 2, 2011

President Obama has put more emphasis than most American presidents on furthering higher education, not surprising given his own involvement in the academy. He has famously called for our nation to regain its position as the leading country in the world in the proportion of young persons with bachelor’s degrees, and has vigorously and largely successfully pushed for increasing Pell Grant aid for lower-income Americans.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

President Obama has put more emphasis than most American presidents on furthering higher education, not surprising given his own involvement in the academy. He has famously called for our nation to regain its position as the leading country in the world in the proportion of young persons with bachelor’s degrees, and has vigorously and largely successfully pushed for increasing Pell Grant aid for lower-income Americans.

Yet by regulatory fiat his Administration has just taken the most viciously anti-poor, anti-first-generation college student move made by this and perhaps any President. The new “gainful employment” rules announced by the Department of Education, while softened from their originally proposed form, are harmful for low-income Americans wanting a college experience.

On the face of it, the rules seem reasonable. Schools whose students have very low levels of vocational achievement risk the loss of access to student loans and grants. The federal government reasonably does not want to throw vast amounts of money at institutions with a dismal track record in terms of improving the economic status of their students.

ADVERTISEMENT

But there are two huge flaws in the regulations. First, they apply disproportionately to for-profit schools, essentially giving state and private institutions operating on a not-for-profit basis a free pass. It is argued that student loan money goes disproportionately to students at for-profit institutions. My first response to that is: So what? More relevantly and factually, a large majority of student-loan money goes to students at traditional not-for-profit institutions, but the nature of the ownership of the institution should be of no bearing in passing regulations relating to learning or vocational outcomes. Looking at Pell Grants, for example, 75 percent of recipients attend nonprofit schools. But the administration is saying with the new regulations, “let’s look only at the 25 percent attending for-profit schools.”

More bluntly, it is crystal clear to me that this regulation reflects the Obama Administration’s hostility to business and free-market capitalism, and is a deliberate attempt to tilt the balance in American higher education away from schools operating on a commercial market-based model. It is a move governed more by ideology than common sense. At a practical level, it appears the regulation will significantly close down a number of programs and hurt many students pursuing degrees.

Actually, another motive for proceeding with the regulations in the face of bitter bipartisan opposition has been suggested by others that is even less defensible if valid. In an excellent blog on The Hill web site, Kevin P. Chavous opined that “a cloud is forming around the motives of those crafting the gainful employment rules and short sellers who stand to profit if private-sector education stocks tumble.”

And what group of students will be impacted? Wealthy students? White kids from upper-middle-class homes? To the contrary, some 41 percent of the enrollment in the four-year for-profits is made up of Hispanic or black students, compared with 28 percent for all of higher education. The for-profit schools are skewed towards serving the poor and minorities.

The Obama call for greater higher-education participation can be achieved only if groups with low participation are motivated to go to college. Yet the administration is moving to close down schools that have been on the cutting edge of increasing participation amongst these groups. Whereas many traditional schools have not wanted to dirty their hands reaching out to these down market students (just look at the low proportion of Pell recipients at the elite schools), the for-profits have done so.

ADVERTISEMENT

The six-year graduation rate reported by the federal government is pathetically low at some traditional schools: 32% at the University of Texas at El Paso, 26% at Boise State University, 14% at Chicago State. To be sure, the data are flawed in many regards. Yet PayScale.com reports median earnings of graduates with one to four years experience to be higher at Kaplan University than at several not-for-profit schools, including the University of Maine at Augusta and Daytona State College. Possibly these schools would have trouble meeting the Department of Education regulations, particularly since the PayScale data are biased in that they report information only on graduates, ignoring the vast numbers of dropouts from many schools receiving federal monies.

A case can be made to restrict federal financial aid. I would go even farther—an excellent case can be made to eliminate such aid. An even more compelling argument can be made that we should not be trying to expand higher education enrollments. But if the U.S. government is going to try to expand higher education and distribute aid to students, it should not base restriction of that aid on the ownership structure of the institution. The overt hostility to this industry has been reflected in sharp declines in the price of for-profit company stocks. Higher education no doubt has some bad actors, and some reforms are needed. But if we are going to apply rigid accountability standards, let’s do it uniformly by leveling the playing field.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Financial aid
The End of Unlimited Grad-School Loans Could Leave Some Colleges and Students in the Lurch

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin