> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Blog Logo

Letters: Rising Income Inequality to Blame for Continued Influence of U.S. News Rankings

Correspondence from Chronicle readers.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Rising Income Inequality to Blame for Continued Influence of U.S. News Rankings

December 1, 2022

To the Editor:

U.S. News & World Report has become so successful, because families want the information the Report is selling, including the rankings and the underlying variables. As Brian Rosenberg mentions, the rankings primarily measure wealth and prestige (“Higher Ed’s Prestige Paralysis,” The Chronicle Review, November 22), but students and their families are not irrational in wanting information about both. That in no way, however, suggests that the rankings are measuring the quality of the education offered or all the attributes of that education that a student might care about.

While the rankings are not the cause of wealth and prestige mattering in higher education as Rosenberg mentions, their continued influence is the result of the rising income inequality in the economy and across higher education institutions over the last 40 years. The rankings are not an independent cause of the challenges facing higher education, but instead a symptom. Would the rankings matter as much if the wealth and resources available at different colleges and universities were more equal and family incomes were as well? The effects on the behavior of both students and institutions would be significantly less.

The problems facing higher education are not the rankings, but the rising inequality in resources available to different institutions of higher education and the rising income inequality of American families, which is putting higher education and its benefits out of reach of many of them. Eliminating the rankings will not address these more fundamental challenges facing the economy and higher education.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

U.S. News & World Report has become so successful, because families want the information the Report is selling, including the rankings and the underlying variables. As Brian Rosenberg mentions, the rankings primarily measure wealth and prestige (“Higher Ed’s Prestige Paralysis,” The Chronicle Review, November 22), but students and their families are not irrational in wanting information about both. That in no way, however, suggests that the rankings are measuring the quality of the education offered or all the attributes of that education that a student might care about.

While the rankings are not the cause of wealth and prestige mattering in higher education as Rosenberg mentions, their continued influence is the result of the rising income inequality in the economy and across higher education institutions over the last 40 years. The rankings are not an independent cause of the challenges facing higher education, but instead a symptom. Would the rankings matter as much if the wealth and resources available at different colleges and universities were more equal and family incomes were as well? The effects on the behavior of both students and institutions would be significantly less.

The problems facing higher education are not the rankings, but the rising inequality in resources available to different institutions of higher education and the rising income inequality of American families, which is putting higher education and its benefits out of reach of many of them. Eliminating the rankings will not address these more fundamental challenges facing the economy and higher education.

Catharine Hill
Managing Director of Ithaka S + R

ADVERTISEMENT

President Emerita, Vassar College

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin