> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Blog Logo

Letters: Student Evaluations Will Never Be Very Valid or Valuable

Correspondence from Chronicle readers.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Student Evaluations Will Never Be Very Valid or Valuable

January 21, 2019

To the Editor:

Your article, “Colleges Are Getting Smarter About Student Evaluation. Here’s How” (The Chronicle, January 13), may indicate that colleges and universities are paying more attention to the issue of student evaluations, but there is no indication that they are doing anything that makes them more valid or valuable for professors. There is also no indication that they are making them less strategic for professors who understandably use them to bolster a portfolio for retention, promotion, and tenure.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

Your article, “Colleges Are Getting Smarter About Student Evaluation. Here’s How” (The Chronicle, January 13), may indicate that colleges and universities are paying more attention to the issue of student evaluations, but there is no indication that they are doing anything that makes them more valid or valuable for professors. There is also no indication that they are making them less strategic for professors who understandably use them to bolster a portfolio for retention, promotion, and tenure.

I have been teaching for over four decades at Towson University and have been on its main legislative body for nearly four decades. I have received high teaching evaluations throughout that period with few if any exceptions, but I have never thought I was an effective teacher because of my high ratings.

The best professor I had in my graduate and undergraduate days told a few of us graduate students that he would, days before student evaluations, give an easy test, apologize to students for giving them such a difficult test, and compliment them lavishly for their surprisingly excellent performance, a performance which proved how well they had processed the material from their class. This endeavor yielded predictably high evaluations.

He related this story humorously, but the lesson was earnest.

ADVERTISEMENT

On a few specific points in the article:

• Online evaluations, unless invalidated by threats of grade withholding, in contrast with in-class evaluations, encourage polarized and smaller numbers of respondents. At Towson, many classes have gone from 90 percent-plus to 20-30 percent response rate.
• The use of midterm evaluations is primarily a craven way to bolster evaluations. Student dissatisfaction is no reason to change the method or content of a course. If a professor finds that a teaching strategy does not yield student understanding, he or she will infer that quite easily in class discussion and by intermittent testing.
• The notion that there is a way to eliminate biases — specifically, gender, racial, and ethnic biases — is a fool’s errand. First of all, there is an inexhaustible number of biases that affect student evaluations and student learning, including a professors’ personality, humor, age, height, class size, physical comfortability, and a multitude of other factors. There is no way to eliminate such biases anymore than there is a way to eliminate such factors in the choice of a lifelong mate. Moreover, if a student isn’t learning from a professor, why does it help to make salient to students demographic or other factors that may create a self-fulfilling prophesy effect in their learning?
• There is a small percentage of students in each class who have the wherewithal to provide valuable insights, but when contaminated by know-nothings, special pleaders, and personal biases, in the aggregate they are of limited value at best.

The fact is that every couple of years, scholars and others will come up with new “answers” on how to make student evaluations more valid and important, but they cannot do so. Use student evaluations for retention, promotion, and tenure, but use them tenuously only.

Richard E. Vatz

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor of Rhetoric and Communication
Towson University
Towson, Md.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin