To the Editor:
Leonard Cassuto, in his Chronicle Review essay, “Why Has Boston University Stopped Accepting Grad Students?” (December 10), suggests that BU’s action might either have resulted “from anti-union animus” or, alternatively, from “economic contraction.”
Ph.D. programs in the humanities have always been a game of numbers; in my prior experience as Director of Graduate Studies for the field of architecture at Cornell, Ph.D. students typically served as TAs during the three years that they didn’t receive their two years of fellowships. Since our colleges pay the costs for teaching assistantships (whereas the graduate school pays for the fellowships), both administrative bodies had financial constraints in terms of the number of Ph.D. students admitted. Naturally, the colleges also benefited from the grad teaching that is done with these assistantships, but there are only a certain number of such positions that the colleges need in any given year. Another “number” that enters into these calculations is the number of Ph.D. students that each graduate faculty member supervises: As admissions to the PhD programs are cut or reduced, the number of faculty “needed” to supervise them also decreases, although this number is also affected by the required and elective courses that must be offered (for both undergraduate and graduate programs). So it’s a fairly complex set of intersecting costs and benefits that need to be reconciled.
To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.
Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.
Don’t have an account? Sign up now.
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.
