> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Blog Logo

Letters: What’s Wrong With Informing Students About Their Options?

Correspondence from Chronicle readers.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

What’s Wrong With Informing Students About Their Options?

June 19, 2014

To the Editor:

Though it may seem like too much attention is being paid to the issue of, and solutions to, the problem of undermatching, it is a mistake to disregard a $6 mailing as merely hype or a “distraction” from systemic concerns facing higher education (

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

Though it may seem like too much attention is being paid to the issue of, and solutions to, the problem of undermatching, it is a mistake to disregard a $6 mailing as merely hype or a “distraction” from systemic concerns facing higher education (“The $6 Solution,” The Chronicle, June 16).

While a $6 mailing certainly is not the answer to dramatically increasing college completion for low-income students, what’s wrong with informing individual students about their options with a reasonable and cost-effective tool?

At the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation, our mission is focused on serving high-achieving, low-income students and helping them succeed in college and beyond. Our two undergraduate-scholarship programs will fund 420 students this year alone, insuring that these students complete college on time and with little to no debt. And, through our high-school program, hundreds more students are receiving scholarships and advising that will change their life trajectories. Indeed, 98 percent of the students in our Young Scholars Program apply to at least one highly selective school, compared with 47 percent of high-achieving, low-income students nationwide and 94 percent of our scholars enroll in a four-year college in contrast to 44 percent of their similarly-situated peers. We know, however, there are thousands more students like the ones we serve that are not informed or afforded the same opportunities.

We recognize that we cannot provide scholarships for the thousands of students who meet our eligibility requirements, but we celebrate the fact that we help hundreds of students each year meet their potential and achieve their dreams through active mentoring and opening their worlds to colleges and universities that they never thought possible to attend.

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s no doubt that, as a result of the College Board mailing, more high achieving, low-income students will become aware of their options and enroll in institutions where they are more likely to graduate. That’s hardly a distraction.

Emily Froimson
Vice President of Programs
Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
Lansdowne, Va.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin