The Chronicle welcomes correspondence from readers about our articles and about topics we have covered. Please make your points as concisely as possible. We will not publish letters longer than 350 words, and all letters will be edited to conform to our style.
Send letters to letters@chronicle.com. Please include a daytime phone number and tell us what institution you are affiliated with or what city or town you are writing from.
To the Editor:
As scholars of Bosnian and Balkan history, we find a number of characterizations in “World War I Conference in Sarajevo Triggers Ethnic Tensions”
Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.
To the Editor:
As scholars of Bosnian and Balkan history, we find a number of characterizations in “World War I Conference in Sarajevo Triggers Ethnic Tensions” (The Chronicle, June 18) to be misleading.
First, the article uses one conference, which passed without a single incident, to suggest that cultural and academic life in Sarajevo is overwhelmingly riddled with ethnic disputes. The conference in question, “The Great War: Regional Approaches and Global Contexts,” was only one of dozens of events that took place in the Bosnian capital to mark the hundredth anniversary of 1914. Other events included museum exhibits, theater plays by Serbian, Bosnian, and French directors, a street performance with hundreds of dancers, and a bicycle race between Serbian and Muslim-Croat entities in Bosnia. This larger context of cultural production is unfortunately absent from The Chronicle’s report. The wide range of events presents a complex picture that cannot be reduced to the tired cliché of Sarajevo as an ethnically-divided city.
Second, the article misleadingly asserts that “rather than a respectful salutation of Europe’s triumph over parochial nationalism, the conference set off an ethnic firestorm in the Balkans that reached the highest political circles.” While we would like to believe that academic proceedings can trigger such incredibly passionate responses, the reality is quite different. The Sarajevo conference, which we attended, was no different from similar academic events elsewhere. There were speeches, disagreements, boredom, and lots of collegial networking. We did not see “an ethnic firestorm” among the historians, whatever that might look like.
In fact, it is not scholarly or popular opinions, but rather political campaigns—especially by Bosnian Serb and Muslim political actors—that have made the 1914 commemorations into staging grounds for ethno-national platforms. Indeed, at a time when about a million people in Bosnia remain devastated by the floods of May 2014, most citizens are anxiously awaiting government action, not the nuanced judgments of historians researching the First World War.
Nationalism and ethnic hatred remain crucial problems of our age. A better understanding of them will come from in-depth research and careful analysis—and not by retelling pre-scripted stories about supposed “ethnic firestorms” in the Balkans.
Edin Hajdarpasic
Assistant Professor of History
Loyola University Chicago
Chicago
Max Bergholz
Professor of Genocide and Human Rights Studies
Concordia University
Montreal
