> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Blog Logo

Letters: Faculty Members Leaning Out Isn’t a New Phenomenon

Correspondence from Chronicle readers.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Faculty Members Leaning Out Isn’t a New Phenomenon

January 13, 2023

To the Editor:

I do not believe it is a new phenomenon for faculty who have a harsh three-year review to decide not to check all the boxes required of them (“Younger Faculty Are Leaning Out. Is That a Bad Thing?” The Chronicle Review, January 4.) Even decades ago, faculty would switch to checking the boxes they missed by quitting the activities they did well before. I myself focused more on research by finally saying no to the excessive service requests. Others I know decided to ignore the review and continue as they were: challenging the tenure committee to accept their definition of scholarship, service, and teaching.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

I do not believe it is a new phenomenon for faculty who have a harsh three-year review to decide not to check all the boxes required of them (“Younger Faculty Are Leaning Out. Is That a Bad Thing?” The Chronicle Review, January 4.) Even decades ago, faculty would switch to checking the boxes they missed by quitting the activities they did well before. I myself focused more on research by finally saying no to the excessive service requests. Others I know decided to ignore the review and continue as they were: challenging the tenure committee to accept their definition of scholarship, service, and teaching.

Some did not get tenure, some did. In my field, those who did not get tenure could easily land industry jobs so nobody was too worried. At my university, the faculty who were not granted tenure kept the job one more year while challenging the tenure decision, which also gave them time to find another job. Some even landed a new job with tenure at a university that appreciated their approach to serving as a faculty member. This last happened primarily for faculty whose research and funding was spectacular but were denied tenure over teaching, service, or politics.

Ultimately the decision to spend 40, 50, or 60 hours per week on a job is not only a decision to be made by faculty with children. Other faculty have personal concerns as well: aging parents, illnesses, divorces, partner seeking, loneliness, depression... to name a few. I myself was lucky to be physically and mentally healthy but had a small child and a baby.

I was allowed to extend my tenure clock. It was helpful to be able to postpone the decision to take that extra year or not to the last minute. It allowed me to relax and focus on research. I submitted to the top journals because I had time to resubmit elsewhere if necessary. In the end I was lucky, the top journals accepted my work and I had a grant. So I went up for tenure on time rather than taking the extra year.

ADVERTISEMENT

I would like to add that I was able to take year long leaves of absence for each new child. It would be helpful to more faculty to have this option. It is common to have such paid leaves in Europe. I was able to do some research during those leaves and the break from teaching hurt nobody. If your university does not offer childcare leaves, request reduced teaching. You may even be able to replace the teaching with some easy service. You have enough time to establish a teaching record during the tenure process, but if you stop research completely it can be hard to restart it.

Christina Sormani
Professor of Mathematics
Lehman College and CUNY Graduate Center

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin