Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Lingua Franca-Circular Icon

Lingua Franca

Language and writing in academe.

The Third Flaw in the Second Amendment

By Geoffrey K. Pullum October 6, 2015
9EEFE82C-D60F-4F34-B5DA-CFA2325E40E5

I was at a department barbecue in California last summer, where conversation had turned to some recent school shooting, and how gun-control legislation can never be enacted because we cannot get round the Second Amendment. A nonacademic visitor suddenly interjected: “Nonsense. You’ve already done it.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

9EEFE82C-D60F-4F34-B5DA-CFA2325E40E5

I was at a department barbecue in California last summer, where conversation had turned to some recent school shooting, and how gun-control legislation can never be enacted because we cannot get round the Second Amendment. A nonacademic visitor suddenly interjected: “Nonsense. You’ve already done it.”

Several professorial heads turned toward her. “How do you mean, we’ve already done it?”

“You’ve already passed laws limiting the Americans’ ownership of arms. Individuals aren’t allowed to have nuclear weapons. I saw a sign saying this area is a ‘nuclear-free zone.’ There’s your precedent. I doubt if there’s anywhere in America that an individual can own nuclear weapons. It’s probably the same for other kinds of armaments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Professorial brows wrinkled. But of course, she was right. The Second Amendment doesn’t mention guns. It mentions bearing arms. Originally that would have meant muskets, which men were expected to own and bring to the service of the state when needed. If the federal government forbade those, then state governors couldn’t raise an armed militia for defense. But today there is weaponry undreamed of by the founding fathers: truck-mounted machine guns, mortars, grenade launchers, heat-seeking anti-aircraft missiles, thermonuclear bombs. Almost nobody thinks individual Americans should be allowed to own such things.

Given the unquestionable fact that certain kinds of weaponry are restricted to the military or the police, maybe ownership of machine guns should be too. Maybe high-power automatic pistols and hollow-point flesh-ripping bullets shouldn’t be on sale to any lonely and embittered college student. It is at least reasonable to think that the founding fathers might have wanted state and local governments to be free to decide such matters.

The vagueness of the “right to bear arms” part makes a total of three terrible flaws in the botched, blundering amendment in question:

  1. It doesn’t clarify whether its initial participial clause adjunct (the bit about well-regulated state militias being necessary) is supposed to define its purpose to be guaranteeing protection of organized state defense forces.
  2. As I remarked in this post, the main clause is also unspecified in a particularly crucial way. It says the right of the people “shall not be infringed"; but by whom? Just the federal government? Or is it really supposed to block every attempt by any state, county, city, or township in the land from passing gun-control laws, regardless of local conditions or the democratic will?
  3. And “bear arms” is radically vague too. It surely cannot be interpreted to apply to any and all weaponry, so what weapons it should apply to is a matter for debate.

I am not suggesting in any way that these observations are novel. Legal scholars have been mulling over the 27 words of this bungled amendment for centuries. It’s a clumsily worded, vague, useless, legal catastrophe that we have no idea how to interpret in the 21st century.

But why am I wasting keystrokes? No linguistic reasoning about the meaning of the amendment will change anything. The National Rifle Association, that nightmare stalking every congressman, senator, president, judge, and sheriff, will continue to frighten us all into sticking with the status quo, which is that any deranged sophomore can obtain weapons to support a campus killing spree.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last Thursday it was Umpqua Community College, where the gunman, Christopher Harper-Mercer, had 13 legally purchased guns at his disposal (and couldn’t have been prevented from buying them: Oregon is a “shall-issue” state). Next week, perhaps students will be lying under desks begging for their lives on your campus. But no one will lift a finger to stop the roster of similar events from going on and on into the distant future.

I love the freedoms that are constitutionally guaranteed to us Americans by the Bill of Rights, but I believe that in view of the gathering epidemic of slaughter by lonely young men in schools and colleges it is insane not to at least allow localities to experiment with laws limiting or banning the private ownership of guns. As President Obama said the other day, in Britain and in Australia a single really serious school shooting was enough for the government to enact extremely strict gun laws, and the result is that school shootings don’t occur in those countries any more. In America they are commonplace; the Wikipedia listing of them scrolls down for yards.

You may respond that you demand to be free to own guns and you’re not going to let anyone stop you. Fine: You’ll probably get your way. And I’m not here to tell my fellow Americans what they should believe or desire. But don’t tell me that the incompetently worded and triply vague Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees your right to have a shed full of automatic weapons, because it just doesn’t. Its 27 mystifying and ill-considered words cannot bear that weight.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
Wednesday, June 11, 2025 Tucson, Arizona—Doctor Andrew Capaldi poses for a portrait at his lab at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona on Wednesday, June 11, 2025. CREDIT: Ash Ponders for Chronicle
Capaldi Lab—
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan
Photo-based illustration of a student and a professor, each occupying a red circle in a landscape of scribbles.
The Review | Opinion
Meet Students Where They Are? Maybe Not.
By Mark Horowitz

Upcoming Events

Chronfest25_Virtual-Events_Page_862x574.png
Chronicle Festival: Innovation Amid Uncertainty
07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin