Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Lingua Franca-Circular Icon

Lingua Franca

Language and writing in academe.

‘The Right to Tell People What They Do Not Want to Hear’

By Geoffrey K. Pullum November 15, 2017
orwellstatue

On November 7, a statue of George Orwell was unveiled at a piazza outside Broadcasting House, the headquarters of the BBC, in London. The George Orwell Memorial Fund chose that location because for two years (1941–1943) Orwell was a BBC employee.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

orwellstatue

On November 7, a statue of George Orwell was unveiled at a piazza outside Broadcasting House, the headquarters of the BBC, in London. The George Orwell Memorial Fund chose that location because for two years (1941–1943) Orwell was a BBC employee.

Finding myself in London for business reasons at the end of that week, I arranged to have dinner with a good friend, Oliver Kamm, who writes on politics, economics, and language for The Times. We both see an enormous gulf between Orwell’s incontrovertible literary and political influence and his assertions about language.

The sculptor who created the statue, Martin Jennings, calls Orwell an “ethical and intellectual hero” who “anatomised totalitarianism and the misuse of language for political ends with unequalled precision” (see Jennings’s BBC blog post). I’m not competent to judge whether Orwell had an insightful political analysis of totalitarianism (as opposed to just hating it). But one thing on which Oliver and I agree is that people’s admiration for Orwell’s erudition concerning language is sadly misplaced.

ADVERTISEMENT

As Oliver wrote recently in The Times [registration needed], the famous 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language” opens with this utterly unsupported assertion:

Most people who bother with the matter at all would admit that the English language is in a bad way, but it is generally assumed that we cannot by conscious action do anything about it.

English was already the planet’s most influential and widely used language. Did most of those holding an opinion on the matter in 1946 really think English was sick or damaged? Or is this a case of Orwell trying “to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind,” the charge the essay goes on to make about political language?

And when Orwell avers that “it is generally assumed” that we cannot fix it, did he understand that he was making disreputable use of an agentless passive? He would later tell us, bossily: “Never use the passive where you can use the active,” but the rule didn’t hold for him, it seems.

Regular readers will recall my previous criticisms here on Lingua Franca; I have discussed the flagrant unoriginality of Orwell’s critique of lazy clichés and polysyllabic jargon, the absurdity and impossibility of trying to ensure that you should never use any familiar phrase or figure of speech, and the intellectual dishonesty of one stratagem with which Orwell tries to bias us against a familiar syntactic construction. (One day I will address his ill-judged ideas on Newspeak and its effect on thought, but there is no space for that here.)

However, my low regard for his linguistic views does not nullify my respect for his memorable political novels like Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm, or his liberal views on topics like freedom of expression. Chiseled into the wall beside the Broadcasting House statue is a sentence from a proposed preface for Animal Farm that was never actually used or published. Unlike the “never use the passive” nonsense, it is worth commemorating:

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

That dictum is highly relevant today. It has no truck with the notion of “safe spaces” where topics are prohibited lest offense be caused to those of a differing persuasion; it opposes not just government censorship but also voluntary segregation into isolated media bubbles; it offers no comfort to the idea of trigger warnings permitting unwelcome subjects to be evaded; it rejects the strategy of keeping unpopular speakers off campus.

ADVERTISEMENT

America’s universities have been getting a bad reputation of late for caving in to illiberal demands by students contemptuously referred to as the Snowflake Generation. The bad press is largely unjustified (see this excellent commentary in The Economist on “the intolerant fifth”). Posturing provocateurs like Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter would love to see themselves as martyrs to violent lefties, but in practice they seem to get around safely and make plenty of speeches.

I spent the majority of my career on the famously turbulent campus of the University of California at Santa Cruz, where the students are always ready to shut the campus down with a political demonstration or protest march, or imprison the Board of Regents in a dining hall. Yet on that campus I heard lectures by (for example) not only the radical democratic socialist Cornel West but also the fiercely pro-Israel conservative British journalist Melanie Phillips. Both events were peaceful and free from disruption. Both speakers said things I didn’t agree with, but (I beg your pardon) free speech never promised you a rose garden.

The George Orwell Memorial Fund has been kind enough to have a very useful and relevant saying literally carved in stone. Let’s keep it in mind every time an unpopular speaker gets an invitation.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin