Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Lingua Franca-Circular Icon

Lingua Franca

Language and writing in academe.

Infinitives Can Be Split: Grammar Conservatives Face the Shock

By Geoffrey K. Pullum June 7, 2018
the_enterprise

For those who boldly violate the Prime Directive by trying to enrich the general public’s understanding of English grammar and thus change the planetary culture, each tiny triumph is something to treasure. And we had one about a month ago.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

the_enterprise

For those who boldly violate the Prime Directive by trying to enrich the general public’s understanding of English grammar and thus change the planetary culture, each tiny triumph is something to treasure. And we had one about a month ago. The Economist announced (April 28, 2018) that the new edition of its style guide would no longer proscribe the “split infinitive.”

I like to think discussion on Lingua Franca helped to stiffen the magazine’s resolve on this issue (see this 2016 post, following up this one two years earlier, and this one two years before that).

Naturally, letters to the editor flocked in. The May 26 issue printed four of them (subheadlined, inevitably, “To boldly go”).

ADVERTISEMENT

Jack Winkler wrote enthusiastically from London: “Please relentlessly continue to radically cull prescriptive language rules. There are many more that need discarding.” (To radically cull is his little joke, of course, illustrating the very easily recognized construction that is under discussion. People cannot resist doing this.)

Oscar Despard, in Dublin, had only one regret: “Your change in grammar rules will surely lead to the sad demise of that finest subgenre of correspondence to The Economist: the letter designed grammatically to mock your avoidance of the split infinitive.” (Grammatically to mock is his little joke, of course, illustrating avoidance of the very easily recognized construction that is under discussion. People cannot resist doing this.)

H. Coleman Switzkay, of Bala Cynwyd, Penn., by contrast, felt dejected:

Et tu, Brute? I pen this missive heavy of heart and slumped in despair. Now that your venerable publication, the last bastion of grammatical fortitude, has abandoned its principled stand against splitting the infinitive, are any of the sacred rules of grammar safe? What next? Will we all soon be pondering the question of to be or to not be?

(To not be is his little joke, of course, illustrating the very easily recognized construction that is under discussion. People cannot resist doing this. ... Is it just me, or are you having a déjà vu experience?)

Switzkay flaunts his conservatism in vocabulary: missive, venerable, bastion, fortitude — he writes to us from the 19th century.

ADVERTISEMENT

But his knowledge of the past is faulty: The Economist never had a “principled stand” against placing adverbs between to and a following verb. The style guide’s stance appealed merely to cowardice: “The ban is pointless. Unfortunately, to see it broken is so annoying to so many people that you should observe it.” No edict was ever less principled.

Switzkay also holds (or affects to hold) the weird belief that allowing an adverb to intervene in a to + Verb sequence will eventually yield to requiring it, forcing the rewording of Hamlet’s soliloquy. (I remember meeting a homophobic worker in the printing industry in Queens back in 1980, when People v. Onofre had just made homosexual acts legal in the state of New York; he told me forcefully that he was planning to “get out of New York State before they make it obligatory.”) Grammarians are not in the business of Shakespeare expurgation, or banning natural-sounding and frequent constructions like not to be outdone.

One further letter-writer, J.M. Hallinan of Sydney, Australia, is also a conservative. He refers back to a quote from G.B. Shaw that appeared in the Johnson column on language in The Economist on April 28 (Shaw, on finding his split infinitives “corrected” by a subeditor, told the editor: “I ask you, sir, to put this man out. Set him adrift and try an intelligent Newfoundland dog in his place, without interfering with his perfect freedom of choice between ‘to suddenly go,’ ‘to go suddenly’ and ‘suddenly to go’”). Says Hallinan:

The Economist should not take any notice of that Fabian windbag, George Bernard Shaw. Perhaps your style has been changed to appeal to your large North American readership, unsplit infinitives being extinct in those parts.

Unsplit infinitives extinct? In American newspaper text, to followed directly by a verb is vastly more frequent than to followed by any adverb.

And even if we interpret “unsplit infinitives” as “infinitivals modified by an adverb that is not positioned after the to,” Hallinan’s extinction claim is still wildly false: Infinitival complements in current American writing are not limited to positioning adverbs between to and the verb (able to immediately repay); adverbs are often positioned before the to (able immediately to repay) or following the verb (able to repay immediately).

Like so many conservatives talking about English grammar, Hallinan simply populates the interstellar void of grammar knowledge by inventing facts. People just make stuff up about language — and expect to get away with it.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH
Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin