Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Lingua Franca-Circular Icon

Lingua Franca

Language and writing in academe.

How Are We Supposed to Have Fun?

By Anne Curzan October 16, 2018
Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 11.55.00 AM

The day after my first post on the pronunciation of mischievous, I received a detailed email message from a recently retired English professor with the playful subject line “A Mischievous Response.” Richard (as I will call him, because that is his name — and he gave me permission to quote from his email) had concerns about my use of the phrase “fun, mischievous connotations,” and the concerns had nothing to do with the extra syllable I put in: “

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 11.55.00 AM

The day after my first post on the pronunciation of mischievous, I received a detailed email message from a recently retired English professor with the playful subject line “A Mischievous Response.” Richard (as I will call him, because that is his name — and he gave me permission to quote from his email) had concerns about my use of the phrase “fun, mischievous connotations,” and the concerns had nothing to do with the extra syllable I put in: “mischievious.” In fact, he noted, there are few pronunciations deviating from what might be called standard that he would consider “wrong.”

Richard had, instead, zeroed in on how I was using the word fun. He wrote: “Are you really more comfortable using ‘fun’ as an adjective than you are using a deviant pronunciation of ‘mischievous’? I see that my favored dictionary [the 1973 edition of the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language] does not acknowledge the possibility of ‘fun’ as an adjective.”

The answer is, well, yes: I am completely comfortable using fun as an adjective. But my answer is less interesting to me than the question. This concern about using fun as an adjective strikes me as an endangered species in the world of language peeves. I was tickled to see it pop up unsolicited in my inbox.

ADVERTISEMENT

When I give public talks about language peeves, I often include the question about adjectival fun from the American Heritage Dictionary’s usage survey, which asks members of the usage panel to evaluate the acceptability of the following five sentences:

  • That party was really fun.
  • That party was so fun.
  • We went to a fun party.
  • That party was funner than I expected.
  • That was the funnest party I’ve been to this year.

Most audience members at my talks are mystified by the inclusion of the first three sentences at all. Sure, they might be informal, but unacceptable? Funner and funnest: Those are different, but what’s wrong with fun?

I explain the history of fun as a noun, which shifted during the 20th century to an adjective, although its comparative and superlative forms haven’t yet caught up. That is, many of us hold on to the forms more fun and most fun because to compare amounts of the noun fun, we need more and most. Kids, when they learn the language, have the impulse to make fun work like other one-syllable adjectives (e.g., tall/taller/tallest) and readily create funner and funnest until corrected.

My informal polling suggests that funner is “cringier” than funnest. In the long run, I suspect, funnest will become standard first and bring funner into more and more standard usage on its coattails. But adjectival fun needs no coattails.

Richard turned to his 1973 edition of the American Heritage Dictionary, but, as I pointed out to him, if he looked in the online version, he would see that in 2015, 84 percent of the usage panel accepted the sentence We went to a fun party. Of course, this means that 16 percent of the panel did not accept fun as an adjective. The peeve may qualify as endangered, but it is not extinct.

ADVERTISEMENT

Strikingly, as late as 1999, The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage proscribes adjectival fun. The entry states: “fun. Though the commercials may someday win respectability for fun as an adjective (a fun vacation), the gushing sound argues for keeping the word a noun.” I have yet to figure out how fun is gushier as an adjective than it is as a noun, and I am struck by the effort to restrict fun well after that horse had left the noun barn. By the 2015 edition, the Times’s manual labels adjectival fun as simply “colloquial.”

As a historian of the English language, I am interested not only in the process of functional shift that allowed fun to become an adjective, but also in the process of attitudinal shift that, in the case of fun, is erasing a peeve within one person’s lifetime.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin