> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Blog Logo

Percolator: More on Harvard’s Marc Hauser

Research that matters.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

More on Harvard’s Marc Hauser

By  Tom Bartlett
April 25, 2011

The journal Science published a partial replication Monday of a study by Marc Hauser, the embattled Harvard University psychology professor, that “appears to confirm the original findings.” The replication was carried out by Hauser and Justin Wood, the original co-author who had alerted the journal to possible problems. You can find more details

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The journal Science published a partial replication Monday of a study by Marc Hauser, the embattled Harvard University psychology professor, that “appears to confirm the original findings.” The replication was carried out by Hauser and Justin Wood, the original co-author who had alerted the journal to possible problems. You can find more details here.

This is good news for Marc Hauser — or at least it’s not bad news. Had the findings not been replicated, it would have raised suspicions that the results had been faked. But now it appears that the original raw data had simply been discarded, a case of inadequate record-keeping rather than deception.

But it doesn’t mean he’s off the hook. Not by a long shot. Harvard University’s investigation found evidence of eight instances of scientific misconduct involving multiple papers. And the information that has leaked from members of his lab hasn’t portrayed the high-profile researcher in a positive light.

Because the report hasn’t been released, we don’t know what that investigation found (other than that Hauser was deemed guilty of misconduct). It’s unlikely, though, that the investigation hinged on this one experiment.

Hauser was taken out of the classroom this year and the Boston Globe reported just last week that Hauser would be kept out of the classroom next year, too (the Harvard Crimson had erroneously reported that he would be teaching next year).

ADVERTISEMENT

Right now everyone’s waiting for the conclusion of the federal inquiries into Hauser’s research, which were set in motion because some of his experiments used government money. Until then, we probably won’t get a full picture of the allegations nor will we get to hear Hauser’s defense.

Tom Bartlett
Tom Bartlett is a senior writer who covers science and ideas. Follow him on Twitter @tebartl.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin