Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

Ah, Wikipedia!

By Amy Cavender January 29, 2010

You knew that sooner or later one of us would end up doing a Wikipedia post, didn’t you?

Yes, it’s a resource with some potential pitfalls for students. In fact, I’ve been known to point my students to Wikipedia Brown and the Case of the Captured Koala to illustrate one of those pitfalls: sometimes, the information it contains is inaccurate. It’s precisely this sort of problem that led the History Department at Middlebury to ban citations of Wikipedia in student work.

Well, of course college and university students shouldn’t be citing Wikipedia in their work, any more than they should be citing any other encyclopedia–as was noted in an Inside Higher Ed article on the citation ban at Middlebury. And yes, Wikipedia does have a wider range of contributors–some very knowledgeable about their subject, others less so–than more traditional encyclopedias, and it’s good to caution students about that.

I’m in the camp that thinks it’s fine for students to use Wikipedia as a tool to (a) get a quick overview of a subject and (b) find suggestions about other resources that would be appropriate for citation in college-level work. I haven’t experimented with assigning my students to contribute to Wikipedia, as Professors Martha Groom and Dean Taciuch have.

But I do tell my students that it’s fine to use Wikipedia for background. I also show them the history and discussion pages of an article (so they get a sense of how it works), and point out both the self-correcting potential of Wikipedia (which David Parry noted a couple of years ago in an article at Science Progress that also raised some important points about digital literacy) and the speed with which it can be updated (to take an example: Senator Kennedy died very late on August 25; I taught a class at 8:00 am the next day–and his page had already been updated).

A colleague of mine (one of our awesome librarians) has a post at her blog that I’m in full agreement with, and that goes well beyond what I’ve said here. I’ll summarize it (inadequately) thus:

Sometimes Wikipedia’s a useful source, and sometimes not, but it’s worth checking. It covers some topics that are difficult to find in other reference works, and can point students to good, reliable sources.

But seriously, go read the whole thing.

How do you approach the Wikipedia issue with your students?

The image in this post is by Flickr user piston9 and CC-licensed.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

You knew that sooner or later one of us would end up doing a Wikipedia post, didn’t you?

Yes, it’s a resource with some potential pitfalls for students. In fact, I’ve been known to point my students to Wikipedia Brown and the Case of the Captured Koala to illustrate one of those pitfalls: sometimes, the information it contains is inaccurate. It’s precisely this sort of problem that led the History Department at Middlebury to ban citations of Wikipedia in student work.

Well, of course college and university students shouldn’t be citing Wikipedia in their work, any more than they should be citing any other encyclopedia–as was noted in an Inside Higher Ed article on the citation ban at Middlebury. And yes, Wikipedia does have a wider range of contributors–some very knowledgeable about their subject, others less so–than more traditional encyclopedias, and it’s good to caution students about that.

I’m in the camp that thinks it’s fine for students to use Wikipedia as a tool to (a) get a quick overview of a subject and (b) find suggestions about other resources that would be appropriate for citation in college-level work. I haven’t experimented with assigning my students to contribute to Wikipedia, as Professors Martha Groom and Dean Taciuch have.

But I do tell my students that it’s fine to use Wikipedia for background. I also show them the history and discussion pages of an article (so they get a sense of how it works), and point out both the self-correcting potential of Wikipedia (which David Parry noted a couple of years ago in an article at Science Progress that also raised some important points about digital literacy) and the speed with which it can be updated (to take an example: Senator Kennedy died very late on August 25; I taught a class at 8:00 am the next day–and his page had already been updated).

A colleague of mine (one of our awesome librarians) has a post at her blog that I’m in full agreement with, and that goes well beyond what I’ve said here. I’ll summarize it (inadequately) thus:

Sometimes Wikipedia’s a useful source, and sometimes not, but it’s worth checking. It covers some topics that are difficult to find in other reference works, and can point students to good, reliable sources.

But seriously, go read the whole thing.

How do you approach the Wikipedia issue with your students?

The image in this post is by Flickr user piston9 and CC-licensed.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin