Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

Is it too early to think about grading?

By Jason B. Jones August 25, 2009

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

Especially if your semester hasn’t started yet, it probably seems a bit early to think about grading. But spending a little time now setting up the broad parameters of your papers or projects can pay off dramatically during the semester, when you’re too busy and tired to think straight.

I like to use rubrics when grading. A rubric is a checklist or a template that you can use to quickly indicate strengths and weaknesses of a paper. Here’s one that I use to grade a very focused close reading assignment that I call an “explication paper” (rubric; description of the assignment).

Rubrics can make grading faster: tick off boxes on the table or checklist, write out a quick terminal comment, and you’re done. They also can help safeguard you against overcommenting. Many rubrics come with points associated with various levels of achievement, so that assigning a grade is simply a matter of adding up the totals. (You’ll note that mine doesn’t do that: I ended up spending too much time fiddling with the points to make ‘em agree with my internal sense of what the paper had achieved. I’ll also admit that I provide preposterous amounts of feedback. Too much for many students, but, funnily enough, the exact amount I got from the three or four professors who influenced me the most.)

But the real advantages of rubrics are twofold:

  • They can make grading seem less subjective. A rubric articulates standards of performance, and then it’s just a matter of comparing the rubric against the paper. I can train a class to grade with my rubric with just a few sample papers. If you do that before returning papers–and preferably before collecting them!–you get buy-in to your grading scheme.
  • They also make explicit the relationship between the assignment and the learning outcomes for the course. If you’ve articulated what you want students to learn for the course, then you can explain more precisely what the assignment is measuring. At that point, writing a rubric is simply a matter of turning those outcomes into different performance standards (usually on a 3- or 5-point scale). All students know that professors want different things in writing assignments; this method helps make that seem less arbitrary.

For these points to achieve best pedagogical effect, it’s best to publicize the rubric before the assignment is due. Put it online, or even photocopy it on the back of your assignment writeup. If you can start thinking now about what you want each assignment to do, you can start roughing out a draft of a rubric that will be genuinely useful.

All of which is just to say that the economizing effect of rubrics is real, but by being upfront about your grading methods, you can also reinforce the pedagogical design of your course, and legitimize the (very hard, and surprisingly thankless) work of grading.

Do you use a rubric? What works (or, alternatively, why not)?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

Especially if your semester hasn’t started yet, it probably seems a bit early to think about grading. But spending a little time now setting up the broad parameters of your papers or projects can pay off dramatically during the semester, when you’re too busy and tired to think straight.

I like to use rubrics when grading. A rubric is a checklist or a template that you can use to quickly indicate strengths and weaknesses of a paper. Here’s one that I use to grade a very focused close reading assignment that I call an “explication paper” (rubric; description of the assignment).

Rubrics can make grading faster: tick off boxes on the table or checklist, write out a quick terminal comment, and you’re done. They also can help safeguard you against overcommenting. Many rubrics come with points associated with various levels of achievement, so that assigning a grade is simply a matter of adding up the totals. (You’ll note that mine doesn’t do that: I ended up spending too much time fiddling with the points to make ‘em agree with my internal sense of what the paper had achieved. I’ll also admit that I provide preposterous amounts of feedback. Too much for many students, but, funnily enough, the exact amount I got from the three or four professors who influenced me the most.)

But the real advantages of rubrics are twofold:

  • They can make grading seem less subjective. A rubric articulates standards of performance, and then it’s just a matter of comparing the rubric against the paper. I can train a class to grade with my rubric with just a few sample papers. If you do that before returning papers–and preferably before collecting them!–you get buy-in to your grading scheme.
  • They also make explicit the relationship between the assignment and the learning outcomes for the course. If you’ve articulated what you want students to learn for the course, then you can explain more precisely what the assignment is measuring. At that point, writing a rubric is simply a matter of turning those outcomes into different performance standards (usually on a 3- or 5-point scale). All students know that professors want different things in writing assignments; this method helps make that seem less arbitrary.

For these points to achieve best pedagogical effect, it’s best to publicize the rubric before the assignment is due. Put it online, or even photocopy it on the back of your assignment writeup. If you can start thinking now about what you want each assignment to do, you can start roughing out a draft of a rubric that will be genuinely useful.

All of which is just to say that the economizing effect of rubrics is real, but by being upfront about your grading methods, you can also reinforce the pedagogical design of your course, and legitimize the (very hard, and surprisingly thankless) work of grading.

Do you use a rubric? What works (or, alternatively, why not)?

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing the logos of Instragram, X, and TikTok being watch by a large digital eyeball
Race against the clock
Could New Social-Media Screening Create a Student-Visa Bottleneck?
Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful Ed-Tech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin