Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

Is it too early to think about grading?

By Jason B. Jones August 25, 2009

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

Especially if your semester hasn’t started yet, it probably seems a bit early to think about grading. But spending a little time now setting up the broad parameters of your papers or projects can pay off dramatically during the semester, when you’re too busy and tired to think straight.

I like to use rubrics when grading. A rubric is a checklist or a template that you can use to quickly indicate strengths and weaknesses of a paper. Here’s one that I use to grade a very focused close reading assignment that I call an “explication paper” (rubric; description of the assignment).

Rubrics can make grading faster: tick off boxes on the table or checklist, write out a quick terminal comment, and you’re done. They also can help safeguard you against overcommenting. Many rubrics come with points associated with various levels of achievement, so that assigning a grade is simply a matter of adding up the totals. (You’ll note that mine doesn’t do that: I ended up spending too much time fiddling with the points to make ‘em agree with my internal sense of what the paper had achieved. I’ll also admit that I provide preposterous amounts of feedback. Too much for many students, but, funnily enough, the exact amount I got from the three or four professors who influenced me the most.)

But the real advantages of rubrics are twofold:

  • They can make grading seem less subjective. A rubric articulates standards of performance, and then it’s just a matter of comparing the rubric against the paper. I can train a class to grade with my rubric with just a few sample papers. If you do that before returning papers–and preferably before collecting them!–you get buy-in to your grading scheme.
  • They also make explicit the relationship between the assignment and the learning outcomes for the course. If you’ve articulated what you want students to learn for the course, then you can explain more precisely what the assignment is measuring. At that point, writing a rubric is simply a matter of turning those outcomes into different performance standards (usually on a 3- or 5-point scale). All students know that professors want different things in writing assignments; this method helps make that seem less arbitrary.

For these points to achieve best pedagogical effect, it’s best to publicize the rubric before the assignment is due. Put it online, or even photocopy it on the back of your assignment writeup. If you can start thinking now about what you want each assignment to do, you can start roughing out a draft of a rubric that will be genuinely useful.

All of which is just to say that the economizing effect of rubrics is real, but by being upfront about your grading methods, you can also reinforce the pedagogical design of your course, and legitimize the (very hard, and surprisingly thankless) work of grading.

Do you use a rubric? What works (or, alternatively, why not)?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

image by flickr user davidsilver / cc licensed

Especially if your semester hasn’t started yet, it probably seems a bit early to think about grading. But spending a little time now setting up the broad parameters of your papers or projects can pay off dramatically during the semester, when you’re too busy and tired to think straight.

I like to use rubrics when grading. A rubric is a checklist or a template that you can use to quickly indicate strengths and weaknesses of a paper. Here’s one that I use to grade a very focused close reading assignment that I call an “explication paper” (rubric; description of the assignment).

Rubrics can make grading faster: tick off boxes on the table or checklist, write out a quick terminal comment, and you’re done. They also can help safeguard you against overcommenting. Many rubrics come with points associated with various levels of achievement, so that assigning a grade is simply a matter of adding up the totals. (You’ll note that mine doesn’t do that: I ended up spending too much time fiddling with the points to make ‘em agree with my internal sense of what the paper had achieved. I’ll also admit that I provide preposterous amounts of feedback. Too much for many students, but, funnily enough, the exact amount I got from the three or four professors who influenced me the most.)

But the real advantages of rubrics are twofold:

  • They can make grading seem less subjective. A rubric articulates standards of performance, and then it’s just a matter of comparing the rubric against the paper. I can train a class to grade with my rubric with just a few sample papers. If you do that before returning papers–and preferably before collecting them!–you get buy-in to your grading scheme.
  • They also make explicit the relationship between the assignment and the learning outcomes for the course. If you’ve articulated what you want students to learn for the course, then you can explain more precisely what the assignment is measuring. At that point, writing a rubric is simply a matter of turning those outcomes into different performance standards (usually on a 3- or 5-point scale). All students know that professors want different things in writing assignments; this method helps make that seem less arbitrary.

For these points to achieve best pedagogical effect, it’s best to publicize the rubric before the assignment is due. Put it online, or even photocopy it on the back of your assignment writeup. If you can start thinking now about what you want each assignment to do, you can start roughing out a draft of a rubric that will be genuinely useful.

All of which is just to say that the economizing effect of rubrics is real, but by being upfront about your grading methods, you can also reinforce the pedagogical design of your course, and legitimize the (very hard, and surprisingly thankless) work of grading.

Do you use a rubric? What works (or, alternatively, why not)?

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin