Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

Lesson Planning for the University Classroom

By Billie Hara January 7, 2010

We’ve all heard about faculty stereotypes: the absent-minded professor, the one who so entrenched in her own research that she doesn’t have any desire to focus on students; the disheveled, unkempt, and disorganized professor who is totally brilliant (if you can keep up with his nonlinear way of “espousing knowledge”); or the faculty member who reads lecture material from 30-year old faded and dog-eared notes. We see these stereotypes in the modern media and we laugh. “I have a colleague just like that!”, “I had a professor like that once!”, or “I’m not one of those!” Interestingly, it’s never us; it’s always someone else who fits these stereotypes.

Unfortunately, there is some truth to these three stereotypical images. Some professors can focus on their own research to the exclusion of teaching, they can be disorganized but brilliant, and they sometimes lecture from dated material. What these stereotypes fail to do—or do inadequately—is focus on student learning. Teaching in a university classroom requires preparation and a redirection of focus. The teaching is not about us; it’s about the students.

One way to focus teaching on student learning is to create and work from lesson plans, plans that keep student learning at the forefront of class sessions. Some of us don’t know need to work from lesson plans as we know our material and we’ve taught it for a long time, but many of us do, or we need to. (In the attempt at full disclosure, I am a teacher who is not very structured. I like spontaneity and free-flowing conversations in a classroom, as I can usually direct these to the topics we are studying. However, students like knowing what to expect each day, and I’m striving to include more structure in my classes.) Lesson plans can help us keep student learning objectives at the forefront of our teaching. They can also—if they are flexible enough—help us avoid the faculty stereotypes noted above.

In teacher education, “The Madeline Hunter” style of lesson planning is almost sacrosanct, as Schools or Colleges of Education use this style as THE preferred form of lesson planning. In this style, a teacher would break down each lesson according to the following format (or a version of this format). Each lesson might be one class session or maybe one unit depending upon the age and ability of the student.

  1. Objectives
  2. Set [hook]
  3. Standards/expectations
  4. Teaching (Input, Modeling/demo, Direction giving, Checking for understanding)
  5. Guided Practice
  6. Closure
  7. Independent Practice

The teacher works methodically to achieve each objective, set, standard, guided practice, independent practice, etc. In this model, there is not much room for spontaneity, or “winging it.” The Madeline Hunter style of lesson planning has much strength. It forces teachers to consider course objectives and standards. It gives teachers, almost systematically, ways to engage students in course material. It helps build in assessment and evaluation into each lesson. For some educators, this formulaic style works just fine, particularly if students are learning course content.

The style of lesson planning mentioned here (the Madeline Hunter style plus many others) are perfectly fine ways to plan lessons. Nevertheless, not everyone needs a seven-step formula, particularly when one has been teaching for some time. Meagan Rodgers, at Intent/ Effect (and @meaganrodgers on Twitter), devised a lesson plan a few years ago that takes some of Madeline Hunter’s structure, and applies it to a more modern classroom.

In this style, Rodgers lists the date of a particular class, the goals for that class, the assignment for the course, and any announcements she might make during their time together. In the description of activities, Rodgers uses sticky notes to order that day’s activities (she also includes time estimates for each activity). The beauty of sticky notes is that she can shift the order of activities or even move an activity to another day if students have engaged more fully than she expected in their work for that day.

This method gives her (and her students) opportunity to connect with course material and the flexibility to tackle that material in a number of directions. To be clear, the formal lesson planning style noted above could also include ways to veer off the scheduled topic, but not as easily as Rodgers’ style.

These two different lesson-planning methods each keep course content and student learning at the forefront of a classroom session.

If we are teaching in this manner, the course becomes less about us (and the stereotypes noted at the beginning of this post) and more about student engagement. Can students engage in course material without every second of class time planned and orchestrated? Of course they can. However, if we want to make sure they do, we plan for it.

How do you plan for your classes? Is there a style you use or a particular method? Please leave your suggestions in comments below.

(Image of Lesson Planning Sheet by intenteffect [Meagan Rodgers] and used under the Creative Commons license.)

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

We’ve all heard about faculty stereotypes: the absent-minded professor, the one who so entrenched in her own research that she doesn’t have any desire to focus on students; the disheveled, unkempt, and disorganized professor who is totally brilliant (if you can keep up with his nonlinear way of “espousing knowledge”); or the faculty member who reads lecture material from 30-year old faded and dog-eared notes. We see these stereotypes in the modern media and we laugh. “I have a colleague just like that!”, “I had a professor like that once!”, or “I’m not one of those!” Interestingly, it’s never us; it’s always someone else who fits these stereotypes.

Unfortunately, there is some truth to these three stereotypical images. Some professors can focus on their own research to the exclusion of teaching, they can be disorganized but brilliant, and they sometimes lecture from dated material. What these stereotypes fail to do—or do inadequately—is focus on student learning. Teaching in a university classroom requires preparation and a redirection of focus. The teaching is not about us; it’s about the students.

One way to focus teaching on student learning is to create and work from lesson plans, plans that keep student learning at the forefront of class sessions. Some of us don’t know need to work from lesson plans as we know our material and we’ve taught it for a long time, but many of us do, or we need to. (In the attempt at full disclosure, I am a teacher who is not very structured. I like spontaneity and free-flowing conversations in a classroom, as I can usually direct these to the topics we are studying. However, students like knowing what to expect each day, and I’m striving to include more structure in my classes.) Lesson plans can help us keep student learning objectives at the forefront of our teaching. They can also—if they are flexible enough—help us avoid the faculty stereotypes noted above.

In teacher education, “The Madeline Hunter” style of lesson planning is almost sacrosanct, as Schools or Colleges of Education use this style as THE preferred form of lesson planning. In this style, a teacher would break down each lesson according to the following format (or a version of this format). Each lesson might be one class session or maybe one unit depending upon the age and ability of the student.

  1. Objectives
  2. Set [hook]
  3. Standards/expectations
  4. Teaching (Input, Modeling/demo, Direction giving, Checking for understanding)
  5. Guided Practice
  6. Closure
  7. Independent Practice

The teacher works methodically to achieve each objective, set, standard, guided practice, independent practice, etc. In this model, there is not much room for spontaneity, or “winging it.” The Madeline Hunter style of lesson planning has much strength. It forces teachers to consider course objectives and standards. It gives teachers, almost systematically, ways to engage students in course material. It helps build in assessment and evaluation into each lesson. For some educators, this formulaic style works just fine, particularly if students are learning course content.

The style of lesson planning mentioned here (the Madeline Hunter style plus many others) are perfectly fine ways to plan lessons. Nevertheless, not everyone needs a seven-step formula, particularly when one has been teaching for some time. Meagan Rodgers, at Intent/ Effect (and @meaganrodgers on Twitter), devised a lesson plan a few years ago that takes some of Madeline Hunter’s structure, and applies it to a more modern classroom.

In this style, Rodgers lists the date of a particular class, the goals for that class, the assignment for the course, and any announcements she might make during their time together. In the description of activities, Rodgers uses sticky notes to order that day’s activities (she also includes time estimates for each activity). The beauty of sticky notes is that she can shift the order of activities or even move an activity to another day if students have engaged more fully than she expected in their work for that day.

This method gives her (and her students) opportunity to connect with course material and the flexibility to tackle that material in a number of directions. To be clear, the formal lesson planning style noted above could also include ways to veer off the scheduled topic, but not as easily as Rodgers’ style.

These two different lesson-planning methods each keep course content and student learning at the forefront of a classroom session.

If we are teaching in this manner, the course becomes less about us (and the stereotypes noted at the beginning of this post) and more about student engagement. Can students engage in course material without every second of class time planned and orchestrated? Of course they can. However, if we want to make sure they do, we plan for it.

How do you plan for your classes? Is there a style you use or a particular method? Please leave your suggestions in comments below.

(Image of Lesson Planning Sheet by intenteffect [Meagan Rodgers] and used under the Creative Commons license.)

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin