Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

Mid-Term Teaching Evaluations

By Billie Hara September 25, 2009

It’s almost midterm, a time to gauge just how well our students are learning the material we are teaching them. But what about our performance? Who is evaluating how we are doing, if we’re being effective, or if students are learning? Mid-term teaching evaluations can be a wonderful tool to gauge how students are perceiving the course, the material, and our teaching.

By conducting mid-term teaching evaluations, you have the students’ perspective once they’ve experienced enough of the course to provide constructive feedback, but while there is still enough time in the course to make some substantive changes (if needed). Learning about a potential problem can have long-term results for you and for your students. For students, a mid-term evaluation can provide an outlet for simmering frustrations that you could possibly change. On the other hand, you have the opportunity to find out what is working well in a course (so you can build on that positive feedback).

According to Stanford University’s Center for Teaching and Learning (Tomorrow’s Professor mailing list by Rick Reis), many faculty who use mid-term teaching evaluations also receive higher end-of-term evaluations.

Mid-term evaluations don’t have to be complicated or time consuming. They can also provide more information than some end-of-term Likert-scale evaluations that provide percentages but no commentary. To avoid these issues, many educators find the SGID (Small Group Instructional Diagnosis) useful. SGID is a structured mid-term interview of a class, and this interview provides specific feedback on what the students like about a course, what they feel needs improvement, and their ideas on how to carry out the improvement. SGID can also ask students about their own responsibility for learning in a course. A professional from a center for teaching and learning on your campus can administer the SGID, or you might have a colleague interview your students. The National Teaching and Learning Forum provides a lot of very helpful information about SGID.

If you wanted an often easier method of gaining mid-term feedback on your courses, you can use the survey function built in within many course management systems. You could even create your own evaluation (using such questions as those provided by the McGraw Center at Yale ) on an on-line survey program (Survey Monkey, for example).

What are your thoughts or experiences on mid-term teaching evaluations? Any cautionary tales or helpful hints? Please leave them in comments below.

(Image by flickr user that blonde girl. Licensed through Creative Commons.)

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

It’s almost midterm, a time to gauge just how well our students are learning the material we are teaching them. But what about our performance? Who is evaluating how we are doing, if we’re being effective, or if students are learning? Mid-term teaching evaluations can be a wonderful tool to gauge how students are perceiving the course, the material, and our teaching.

By conducting mid-term teaching evaluations, you have the students’ perspective once they’ve experienced enough of the course to provide constructive feedback, but while there is still enough time in the course to make some substantive changes (if needed). Learning about a potential problem can have long-term results for you and for your students. For students, a mid-term evaluation can provide an outlet for simmering frustrations that you could possibly change. On the other hand, you have the opportunity to find out what is working well in a course (so you can build on that positive feedback).

According to Stanford University’s Center for Teaching and Learning (Tomorrow’s Professor mailing list by Rick Reis), many faculty who use mid-term teaching evaluations also receive higher end-of-term evaluations.

Mid-term evaluations don’t have to be complicated or time consuming. They can also provide more information than some end-of-term Likert-scale evaluations that provide percentages but no commentary. To avoid these issues, many educators find the SGID (Small Group Instructional Diagnosis) useful. SGID is a structured mid-term interview of a class, and this interview provides specific feedback on what the students like about a course, what they feel needs improvement, and their ideas on how to carry out the improvement. SGID can also ask students about their own responsibility for learning in a course. A professional from a center for teaching and learning on your campus can administer the SGID, or you might have a colleague interview your students. The National Teaching and Learning Forum provides a lot of very helpful information about SGID.

If you wanted an often easier method of gaining mid-term feedback on your courses, you can use the survey function built in within many course management systems. You could even create your own evaluation (using such questions as those provided by the McGraw Center at Yale ) on an on-line survey program (Survey Monkey, for example).

What are your thoughts or experiences on mid-term teaching evaluations? Any cautionary tales or helpful hints? Please leave them in comments below.

(Image by flickr user that blonde girl. Licensed through Creative Commons.)

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin