> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker: #NetNonNeutral

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

#NetNonNeutral

By  Adeline Koh
April 24, 2014
5281784826-391c32c0ea-b.jpg

The Internet’s potential to create important political change has been one of the most pressing news topics over the past five years. Its relative openness has proved instrumental to recent social revolutions, such as the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street. A big factor in this is the principle of “

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

5281784826-391c32c0ea-b.jpg

The Internet’s potential to create important political change has been one of the most pressing news topics over the past five years. Its relative openness has proved instrumental to recent social revolutions, such as the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street. A big factor in this is the principle of “Net Neutrality,” which holds that all data on the Internet should be treated equally by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and governments, meaning that certain websites and services should not be privileged over others. However, this principle is being threatened.

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission released a statement to introduce new rules that would allow ISPs to charge companies a premium rate for content, or an Internet “fast lane”. This means, for example, that companies such as Netflix, Amazon, or Skype, can pay extra to access faster broadband speeds so that consumers can get to their content faster. On the one hand, this sounds potentially helpful to users who consume a lot of media on the Internet. On the other hand, however, this ruling has the potential to spiral into more politically charged scenarios, where only parties who can afford to pay ISPs premium rates will have easily accessible content—and everyone else is relegated to slow speeds.

Imagine this: an Internet where you can access Apple.com in a fraction of a heartbeat, but a non-profit activist website would take five minutes to load. Which site will get more visitors, and which site will have users leaving before it actually loads? You can read more about the fraught recent history on Net Neutrality here. To summarize, a U.S. Federal court ruling from January 2014 struck down the the FCC’s 2010 Open Internet order—indicating the start of the reversal of the FCC’s previous net neutrality policy.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you find this problematic, join the current campaign to get the FCC to reconsider their stance by using the hashtag #NetNonNeutral on Twitter (some chosen tweets below). The proposed rules are being circulated to the agency’s four other commissioners today (April 24) and will be released for public on May 15. Net Neutrality is an issue which will definitively shape all of our futures.

Usually we go after corporations or media outlets, but now we see the STATE is the creator of these policies. #NetNonNeutral

— Angry Asian Woman (@suey_park) April 24, 2014

Social media activism has power. We know that. We’ve seen that corporate-State interests are deeply scared. #NetNonNeutral — Christopher Carbone (@christocarbone) April 24, 2014

@suey_park One has to wonder if Arab Spring, etc would even have been possible when net neutrality is gone. #NetNonNeutral — Cindy Potts (@CBPotts) April 24, 2014

Freedom of speech is only important to the @FCC when its defending the use of a racial slur like @redskins. #NetNonNeutral

— Dani (@xodanix3) April 24, 2014

Y’all realize #NetNonNeutral means not canceling #AliceInArabia and no apology for #HowIMetYourRacism yellowface? Right?

— Angry Asian Woman (@suey_park) April 24, 2014

ADVERTISEMENT

Concerned about Net Neutrality but unsure what you can do? Go to http://t.co/qkbMq8Rvbv #NetNonNeutral

— Scott (@firescotch) April 24, 2014

[CC-licensed Flickr photo by Sean Weigold Ferguson]

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin