> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Profhacker Logo

ProfHacker: When student evaluations are just plain wrong

Teaching, tech, and productivity.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

When student evaluations are just plain wrong

By  Heather M. Whitney
March 10, 2011
evaluation

This week I finished teaching a course (we have a quad system, in which some courses meet for half-semesters.) In the last two sessions, the students did group presentations for their final projects. At the close of each of these two days, I reminded the students that I had set up an anonymous survey to get their feedback on what they thought worked for the course (and thus they would recommend be continued the next time it is taught) and what didn’t.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

evaluation

This week I finished teaching a course (we have a quad system, in which some courses meet for half-semesters.) In the last two sessions, the students did group presentations for their final projects. At the close of each of these two days, I reminded the students that I had set up an anonymous survey to get their feedback on what they thought worked for the course (and thus they would recommend be continued the next time it is taught) and what didn’t.

After our last class, I browsed over to the form that is collecting the responses, and read something similar to this: “The grading was pretty harsh for the final projects. I would have appreciated if the expectations for the project were presented more clearly. I wish the rubric would have been given out to the students beforehand so that a student does not receive a grade that is both unexpected and entirely unfair.” And, “It would have been helpful to know the grading rubric for the group presentation, so that we could have been adequately prepared.”

The kicker? I posted the rubric to our learning management system (LMS) on January 23 - over one month ago. I also posted an announcement on the LMS to draw their attention to the document, as well as announced it in class.

I quickly posted an announcement to our LMS, saying that I was troubled that the students felt that they did not have enough information to adequately prepare for their presentations. But I also reminded them that the information was available for over a month before the presentations.

ADVERTISEMENT

And now, my mind is already jumping ahead to those all-important official evaluations. I can imagine that similar comments will be made there. With the kind of informal evaluation I am running now, I can have the opportunity to correct misinformation directly. But not all students will see the announcement, and it is likely that some students will still report that they did not have any idea of how they would be evaluated.

I’ve got in my mind some other methods I’ll take to deal with the situation. But I’d like to hear from you. What would you do in such a situation? What steps can a faculty member take to keep incorrect information from making it into evaluations in the first place? How can a faculty member address incorrect information? Let us know in the comments.

[Image Creative Commons licensed / Flickr user BillsoPHOTO]

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin