Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Ticker circle logo

The Ticker

Breaking news from all corners of academe.

3 Military Psychologists Accuse Torture Investigator of ‘Bias’ and ‘Grandstanding’

By Tom Bartlett August 3, 2015

Three Army psychologists have harshly criticized an independent investigation that found that the American Psychological Association had

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Three Army psychologists have harshly criticized an independent investigation that found that the American Psychological Association had colluded with the Department of Defense in shaping ethics rules related to torture, accusing its author of “prosecutorial bias” and “grandstanding rhetoric.”

In a statement posted to an APA email list over the weekend, the three psychologists wrote that the 542-page report put together by David H. Hoffman, a former federal prosecutor, “ignores or distorts key facts” and “fails to include contrary analyses.” The statement cites Mr. Hoffman’s “past interest in holding public office” as a reason for his supposed bias and expresses disappointment at the APA’s “rush to judgement.”

The three Army psychologists are L. Morgan Banks, Debra Dunivin, and Larry C. James, all of whom are mentioned multiple times in Mr. Hoffman’s report. The statement was also signed by Russ Newman, a former APA official who is married to Ms. Dunivin. Mr. Newman resigned as provost and senior vice president for academic affairs at Alliant International University days after the Hoffman report’s release.

ADVERTISEMENT

They deny that there was collusion between the military and the APA to “write guidelines that purposely left wiggle room for abusive interrogations.” Instead they contend that the APA’s much-maligned ethics guidelines, created by the Task Force on Psychological Ethics and National Security, or PENS, were “well crafted” and designed to prevent abuses.

In contrast, the Hoffman report found that officials of the APA and the Department of Defense were involved in a “virtual joint venture” to ensure that the ethics guidelines were not more stringent than the Pentagon’s own internal rules. The Hoffman report includes emails that show how APA officials routinely looked to the military for advice on specific wording choices.

For instance, APA officials eliminated the word “coercive” from a description of interrogation techniques, a word deemed unpalatable to the Defense Department. Emails show that the APA’s ethics director at the time, Stephen Behnke, repeatedly sought the approval and input of Mr. Banks, then the chief psychologist with the Army Special Operations Command, on matters large and small. Mr. Behnke was fired by the APA after the Hoffman report was completed.

While the statement accuses Mr. Hoffman of committing a “host of factual errors,” it does not contain a list of specific falsehoods. Instead it objects primarily to the tone of the report, which it calls “prosecutorial” rather than objective. “Mr. Hoffman’s attack upon our motives and goals is an egregious distortion in its conclusions and irresponsible in its methods, and his recurring theme that we tried to enable rather than halt abuse turns the truth on its head,” the statement says.

The three psychologists write that they are considering their legal options.

ADVERTISEMENT

When asked to respond, Mr. Hoffman wrote via email simply: “We stand by our report.”

One longtime critic of the APA’s interrogation policy, Steven Reisner, dismissed the statement as an attempt to rewrite history. “This idea they are trying to put forward that they were there to protect the detainees is not supported by any evidence, nor do they offer any,” Mr. Reisner said in an interview on Sunday. “What they’re trying to do is reargue the case made by the Bush administration, but the history has turned and that has been completely debunked.”

The back and forth is likely to be a preview of the APA’s annual convention this week in Toronto, where the Hoffman report is expected to dominate discussion.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Tom Bartlett
Tom Bartlett is a senior writer who covers science and ideas. Follow him on Twitter @tebartl.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin