> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Ticker circle logo

The Ticker: Spending Bill Could Revive Year-Round Pell Grants

Breaking news from all corners of academe.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Spending Bill Could Revive Year-Round Pell Grants

By  Kelly Field
June 8, 2016

Year-round Pell Grants could make a comeback under a fiscal-2017 spending bill that Senate appropriators will take up on Thursday.

The bipartisan bill, which made it through a subcommittee on Tuesday, would allow students once more to receive a second scheduled Pell Grant in an award year, five years after Congress ended a short-lived experiment in year-round Pells, citing higher-than-expected costs.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Year-round Pell Grants could make a comeback under a fiscal-2017 spending bill that Senate appropriators will take up on Thursday.

The bipartisan bill, which made it through a subcommittee on Tuesday, would allow students once more to receive a second scheduled Pell Grant in an award year, five years after Congress ended a short-lived experiment in year-round Pells, citing higher-than-expected costs.

Restoring year-round Pell Grants would provide an estimated one million students with an additional $1,650, on average, during the 2017-18 academic year. In a statement, Sen. Lamar Alexander, the Tennessee Republican who is chairman of the education committee, said such a revival “would be the most important news in higher education so far this year.”

But the bill would also dip into a surplus in the Pell Grant program to pay for other programs — a $1.2-billion shift that Sen. Tammy Baldwin, Democrat of Wisconsin, said would set a “dangerous precedent.” Two Democrats in the House of Representatives, Bobby Scott of Virginia and Ruben Hinojosa of Texas, agreed, writing in a statement that the bill “balances other needs on the backs of low-income college students without doing anything to put additional dollars in their pockets each semester.”

The spending bill would increase the maximum Pell Grant by $120, to $5,935, as scheduled, while providing no increase for the TRIO and Gear Up college-prep programs, Federal Work Study, or Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants. The National Institutes of Health would get an additional $2 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Congress created year-round Pell Grants (also known as summer Pell Grants) in 2009, as part of an effort to encourage students to study year-round and finish their degrees faster. In 2010 some 800,000 students received the second grants. But the expansion cost five to nine times as much as federal budgeters had originally estimated, and college financial-aid officials complained that it was complicated to administer. In 2011, Congress killed the year-round grants, saying it had done so to close a shortfall in the program and to preserve the maximum award.

Reviving the year-round program has been a top priority of community colleges and for-profit institutions, which saw summer enrollment increase during the two years it was in effect. For-profit colleges received a third of the summer Pell awards during that time, prompting concerns from some advocates that they were exploiting the program.

In March the Congressional Budget Office reported that the Pell program was operating with a $7.8-billion surplus, a result of lower-than-projected enrollment and eligibility cuts. Advocates for students and borrowers had urged the Education Department to use some of that money to increase the maximum award, but appropriators chose not to.

The spending bill is expected to pass the Senate. House appropriators haven’t released their version of the bill yet, but the speaker of the House, Rep. Paul Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin, signaled support for restoring year-round Pell Grants in an antipoverty plan he released on Tuesday.

“Pell Grants must be more flexible to help meet the needs of today’s students,” the plan says. “By allowing Pell Grants to be used year-round, students will be able to accelerate their coursework, thereby completing their program more quickly and at a lower cost and with less student-loan debt.”

Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin