In January, Cornell University announced that it would be passing the hat for arXiv, the widely used online repository that houses e-prints of journal articles in physics, quantitative biology, mathematics, computer science, and related fields. The repository has long been housed at Cornell but had gotten too expensive to maintain alone, the university said. So Cornell asked other institutions, especially whose researchers who are heavy arXiv users, to pitch in. “Keeping an open-access resource like arXiv sustainable means not only covering its costs, but also continuing to enhance its value, and that kind of financial commitment is beyond a single institution’s resources,” Oya Rieger, Cornell’s associate university librarian for information technologies, said in a statement released at the time.
The Chronicle wondered how the collection was progressing and got in touch with Anne R. Kenney, the university librarian at Cornell, to find out. “This is actually going pretty well,” she said. “I feel energized by what we’ve been able to do.” Cornell has secured pledges from 85 institutions for a total of more than $300,000, Ms. Kenney reported, with a “significant” amount of that money already in hand and other possible partnerships “very close.”
According to Ms. Kenney, Cornell has committed to bearing 15 percent of arXiv’s costs. Even so, it will need to do better than $300,000 in contributions. “We imagine that with necessary upgrades and the increasing linear progression of both [scholarly] contributions to and users of arXiv that a steady-state budget will reach about half a million a year,” the university librarian said. “At $300,000, we’re closing in, but it’s still something where some of those pledges could be one time” or might not materialize.
Cornell has established an advisory committee that’s meeting this month to talk about governance structures and possible collaborations with publishers and scholarly societies. They’re considering whether an NPR-style support model could work, how researchers are really using arXiv, and other issues pertinent to maintaining the repository.
“I think the important thing about arXiv is it raises the issues of institutional support for open access on par with the kinds of support that we offer for other kinds of content,” Ms. Kenney said. “If you can’t make a case for arXiv, it’s going to be difficult to make a case for other critical open-access repositories.”
