Good morning, and welcome to Thursday, January 18. Rick Seltzer wrote today’s Briefing. Julia Piper compiled Comings and Goings. Get in touch: dailybriefing@chronicle.com.
Past is prologue
Political attacks on higher education that have felled two Ivy League leaders follow a long history of similar bullying. Our David Jesse explores that history.
Politicians and preachers have long condemned colleges for supposedly leading the country down the wrong path. College presidents have often borne the brunt of their words. And even campuses that are hardly activist bastions can be at risk if the fervor undercuts their support or funding streams.
Claims that colleges are liberal hotbeds out of sync with the public tend to re-emerge amid national stress, like challenging economic times, the Cold War, or clashes over U.S. political leadership.
These zealous charges can be traced back to when colleges moved away from their religious roots two centuries ago. Today’s evangelicals still call the early 1800s the beginning of higher ed’s liberalization and liberalizing influence. For an example of what was happening at the time, look no further than Harvard, which was shifting from relatively more traditional Calvinism toward Unitarian views. Some ministers of the era called for Harvard’s president to be ousted.
Other notable outcries include:
- In the early 20th century, lawmakers pushed the president of the University of North Carolina to expel professors with liberal beliefs.
- In the 1930s, the National Association of Manufacturers said it spied on Columbia University classrooms to take notes on professors.
- In the early 1950s, professors were swept up in the anti-Communist hysteria of McCarthyism.
- In the late 1950s and early ’60s, a group of Florida lawmakers went after classroom texts they considered subversive and professors they thought to be homosexual.
- In 1966, Ronald Reagan built a successful gubernatorial campaign in part by flogging the University of California at Berkeley. He labeled campus incidents “so contrary to our standards of decent human behavior that I cannot recite them to you in detail.” Soon after Reagan took office, the university system’s board voted to dismiss Clark Kerr as president.
Higher ed is often a “lightning rod” for politicians who want to try out messaging about the direction of society, Teresa Valerio Parrot, founder and principal of TVP Communications, told David.
And still, college presidents have repeatedly been surprised by the attacks, Adam Laats, a professor of education and history at the State University of New York at Binghamton, told him.
Will a strong national voice emerge in defense of higher ed? The college presidency has arguably been diminished by increasing turnover, which limits the relationships a leader can build before stepping up and inviting confrontation.
The bigger questions: How much damage will today’s political attacks do to higher education’s standing and to academic freedom before the fever inevitably breaks? Might the attacks drive any big changes, such as institutions’ becoming more responsive to student needs, bolstering governance structures, or learning to better connect with the public?
Quotable: “As long as there are political rewards for these types of attacks, I don’t think they will stop,” said Michael Harris, a professor of higher education at Southern Methodist University who studies college presidents.
Read David’s full story here.