Good morning, and welcome to Monday, April 8. Eric Kelderman wrote today’s Briefing. Julia Piper compiled Comings and Goings. Get in touch: dailybriefing@chronicle.com. Andrew Mytelka, The Chronicle’s copy-desk chief, wrote the Footnote.
Political fallout from the FAFSA debacle?
The latest twists and turns in the botched rollout of the new Free Application for Federal Student Aid are frustrating college officials, who now must choose, in some cases, between getting offers out quickly and ensuring they’re accurate and fair, reports our Eric Hoover.
FAFSA errors just keep coming. It wasn’t until mid-March that colleges finally began receiving the information they needed to determine how much aid students would be eligible for. But then the Education Department revealed that another technical glitch had led to inaccurate aid estimates for some 200,000 applicants. As if that weren’t enough, the department then told colleges that about 20 percent of the 6.6 million forms processed so far included “inconsistent tax information” that had led to “inaccurate calculations of the Student Aid Index,” or SAI, a number used to determine how much federal aid an applicant should get.
The latest Education Department guidance makes this iteration of the troubled rollout a “choose your own adventure” for colleges. The department said it would reprocess some applications to correct the problems, but it also informed colleges that they could use the incorrect data if they didn’t want to wait for the more accurate SAI. That offer has dismayed financial-aid officials, who fear institutions will be on the hook to the government for offering too much aid, or drive away students if they offer too little.
- You can hear the frustration in his voice: “Making sure we are informing current and prospective students of the correct information — that is what we’re supposed to do,” said Emmanual Guillory, senior director of government relations at the American Council on Education. “But if that results in them potentially getting less aid, then all of a sudden, we’re the bad guys for doing it.”
Who will pay for those problems? The continuing glitches beg an important accountability question: Will there be consequences for top Education Department officials over a FAFSA rollout that couldn’t have gone much worse and is threatening fall enrollment? The FAFSA fallout could also be at least a minor political problem for President Biden, who has struggled to satisfy the far-left faction of his party, which favors across-the-board student-loan cancellation. If the FAFSA derails the college plans of hundreds of thousands or even millions of students, will they and their parents be less inclined to vote for Biden?
The situation is reminiscent of the troubles that President Barack Obama faced after the botched rollout of the Affordable Care Act website, in 2013. Kathleen Sebelius, who was secretary of health and human services at the time, took responsibility for the problems and resigned six months later. In the 2014 midterm election, Democrats acknowledged they had suffered a “shellacking” in part due to the website’s shaky start.