Quote of the day
“Faculty definitely know that people are watching.”
— Erik Larson, chair of the religious-studies department at Florida International University, says it’s unclear whether an ongoing review of courses for antisemitic content or anti-Israeli bias will ultimately lead to censorship.
The review was prompted by alarm over several test questions posed to students at FIU that were shared on X over the summer. After criticism from Randy Fine, a Republican and Jewish member of the Florida House of Representatives, the state’s dozen public universities were told to conduct a keyword search of their undergraduate- and graduate-course descriptions and syllabi for words like “Israel,” “Palestine,” “Zionist,” and “Jewish,” then start a “faculty review” to look for “instances of either antisemitism or anti-Israeli bias” and report them to the chancellor’s office.
Details on that audit have been sparse, but according to spreadsheets obtained from six of those universities by our Emma Pettit, at least 250 courses were flagged for review. While many are related to international politics, Judaism, and the Middle East, some have titles like “Percussion Ensemble,” “General Parasitology,” “Painting Workshop,” and “Global Hip Hop.”
It’s not clear what happens next. Because of the “large volume” of courses submitted for inspection, a spokesperson for the state university system said, “a sample” was chosen for review this semester. She did not specify which courses are being reviewed. Meanwhile, professors whose courses and textbooks were identified for possible review told Emma they were worried about political intrusion.
Read the full story: Do These Courses Contain Antisemitic Content?
Remedies for the modern college presidency
Higher-ed pundits and members of the general public alike are prone to wondering why anyone would want the job of college president. It’s an understandable question — think about the raft of budget shortfalls, enrollment declines, academic-freedom controversies, and high-profile no-confidence votes and resignations many have faced in recent years.
But does the problem lie in individual missteps by one leader, or is it something else? Editors of The Chronicle Review posed that question to 13 current and former presidents, whose diagnoses varied. Among the issues they identified:
- Presidents not engaging in shared governance
- A lack of succession planning at the top of the ladder
- Not enough partnership with businesses and employers
- Inattention to presidential burnout
Read the full story: The College Presidency Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It.