But the idea drew concern given a broad Republican backlash against DEI and accreditation:
- State lawmakers have introduced 86 bills in 28 states over the past two years, seeking to ban or restrict DEI efforts at colleges. Fourteen have become law, according to The Chronicle’s running tally.
- President-elect Trump’s platform promised to “fire radical left accreditors.” Trump’s election victory strengthened the anti-DEI movement in the eyes of many Republicans, Axios has noted.
A free-speech advocate had criticized WSCUC. Moving to nix DEI created the perception the commission “is bowing to political pressure and abandoning its nonpartisan mission to uphold the quality and autonomy of higher education institutions,” Jeremy C. Young, program director of Freedom to Learn at PEN America, wrote earlier this month.
PEN America commended WSCUC for showing “bravery” on Monday. “When politicians threaten to dictate what ideas are permitted on a college campus, the answer’s simple: institutions of higher learning should not comply in advance,” Young wrote.
Some colleges get ahead of the law
At the same time, hundreds of institutions have executed plans to walk away from DEI, with many doing so even before they had to, our Declan Bradley reports.
More than 200 campuses have rolled back DEI efforts since April, according to The Chronicle’s tally. They took various actions, including:
- Restructuring or closing offices, departments, and centers.
- Changing job responsibilities or eliminating the jobs entirely.
- Renaming departments and job titles.
- Revamping policies on the use of diversity statements in admissions, hiring, and promotion.
- Stopping training programs or making them optional.
- Reallocating funding.
Eighty-six campuses changed their policies even though lawmakers didn’t require them to do so, or in response to preemptive university-system directives. Twelve were in states where no DEI-related bill had even been introduced.
More than four million students are enrolled at the colleges putting these changes in place, which are often large public universities.
The bigger picture: The partisan polarization around DEI makes it hard for institutions to do their jobs in a way that everyone sees as apolitical.
“The inquiry has been driven by a desire to make clear what institutions need to do to be effective,” Studley, of WSCUC, told the Daily Briefing. “That is evergreen. It has been our central motivation through many different administrations, through many ways of thinking about it and different terms over time. It’s not a response to the political environment.”
For more: