That’s despite the administration taking action that is clearly hitting campuses. Recent moves to dismantle USAID are poised to undermine programs housed at red-state flagships, The New York Times has noted. USAID’s Feed the Future initiative, which promotes global food access, is built on labs at U.S. institutions like Mississippi State University, where the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Fish operates under a $15-million grant.
- Mississippi State will “continue to monitor” the funding pause, a spokesperson said.
To be sure, this is a fraught time. Lawyers are sorting through novel legal theories and confusing directions from the feds. The stakes are enormous: Federal research funding totaled almost $60 billion for universities in 2023.
And efforts to raid the ivory tower don’t always rankle those off campus. A center that works to improve agriculture abroad doesn’t necessarily resonate with voters at home.
To hear some tell it, higher-ed leaders are hoping to rise above any perceived war on higher education.
- “There was widespread recognition that higher education needs to do a better job of telling its own story, and not lose the narrative to misinformed and misguided critics,” Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Steven Tian, two leadership experts at Yale, wrote in Time about last week’s Yale Higher Education Leadership Summit.
And taking time to evaluate the situation can be a smart strategy. College leaders may fear their institutions will be targeted if they speak up — never mind that the administration is already announcing investigations. And they may hope to better understand how the landscape has actually changed, rather than how the new administration says it’s changed.
- “What is show and what is policy doesn’t shake out for a few months,” John Comerford, the president of Otterbein University, in Ohio, told David. “It would be a mistake to overreact. They want to get a reaction. It’s a ‘stick it to the libs’ kind of thing. It’s not wise to take the bait.”
But that may just be whistling past the graveyard. “The administration will investigate and sue prominent universities to make examples of them and cower the rest into full compliance,” Brendan Cantwell recently wrote in The Chronicle Review. Quiet or not, here they come.
Ironically, the sector’s fundamentals are stronger than expected. First-year enrollment is up, graduation rates have risen, and tuition has been declining in inflation-adjusted terms, Cantwell notes.
And yet it’s a small association and a professors’ union that have challenged Trump in court, not the institutions with multibillion-dollar endowments that find themselves in the crosshairs. The National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education and the American Association of University Professors joined other groups in a lawsuit this week, alleging that the president is overstepping by trying to stamp out diversity, equity, and inclusion in the government and private sector.
The bigger question: Are college leaders making “stick it to the libs” easier, because “the libs” don’t stick up for themselves? Even those who don’t want to directly challenge the Trump administration might find themselves in a stronger position if they were to clearly advocate for their mission and values — because those aren’t supposed to change when the president does.
For more from The Chronicle: