Good morning, and welcome to Wednesday, February 12. Rick Seltzer wrote today’s Briefing. Julia Piper compiled Comings and Goings. Get in touch: dailybriefing@chronicle.com.
What gets measured gets managed
The Trump administration’s spending hacksaw has come for the U.S. Department of Education’s data apparatus, as our Katherine Mangan reports.
Dozens of contracts with the Education Department’s research and statistics arm have been suddenly terminated. Contractors for the Institute of Education Sciences received emails on Monday telling them to stop work. The Trump administration moved to terminate 169 contracts within the institute, according to the American Educational Research Association and the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics.
The terminations come after Elon Musk’s government-efficiency effort swept into the department. Musk’s team has been very publicly performing its work.
That could disrupt key data from the National Center for Education Statistics, which tracks indicators like graduation rates, transfer rates, student demographics, and tuition rates.
- NCES is required by Congress to collect data from pre-kindergarten through college and work-force training. It relies on contractors to bolster its thin staff counts.
“This is an incredible waste of taxpayer dollars,” Dana Tofig, an American Institutes for Research spokesperson, said in an email. “The evaluation and data work that has been terminated is exactly the work that determines which programs are effective uses of federal dollars, and which are not.”
Worries run high about the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. The research group that collects IPEDS data didn’t have its contract terminated, according to AERA. But the group is concerned that contracts for analyzing and reporting on the data have been affected.
None of this is sexy. But it’s important. Policymakers, researchers, and families alike use IPEDS data.
- IPEDS is a treasure trove of information reported by institutions that receive federal student aid. It’s part of the foundation of how we understand higher education at a national level — a collection of information on the likes of enrollment, spending metrics, and student outcomes. Tenured professors use it when they research higher ed. So do students when they compare colleges they might attend.
The bigger picture: Federal education data is far from perfect — your Daily Briefing scribe has long argued essential financial information takes too long to arrive in an age when colleges’ balance sheets can deteriorate quickly, for example. But interrupting these functions without notice risks making it harder to understand if students are learning. And it could very well obfuscate our understanding of whether colleges and the government are putting public dollars to good use.
📱 Read the full story: Education Data in the Lurch as Dozens of Department Contracts Are Axed