Earlier expulsions had already caused a stir. Barnard College, the women’s institution affiliated with Columbia, recently expelled two students who disrupted an Israeli history class in January. According to an activist group, a third student was expelled for participating in the spring 2024 encampments.
This is all connected to last week’s other big story. The Barnard punishments prompted student sit-ins. Present at one of those protests, according to a video that circulated online, was Mahmoud Khalil, a recent Columbia graduate student. Three days later, Khalil was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
To some observers, Columbia’s expulsions on Thursday felt like yet another capitulation to Trump — just days after ICE was able to enter university housing and detain Khalil. He is being held in Louisiana and faces deportation proceedings.
Given the real and immediate consequences they’ve faced, Columbia officials seem to be treading carefully. The university has spent the past 10 days telling some researchers that they’ve lost their funding because of the cancellation of many National Institutes of Health grants. The Trump administration’s Thursday letter indicated that the feds will pursue additional funding cuts as they see fit.
But on campus and across higher ed, many are wondering: Will complying with Trump’s directives even help? Last fall, Columbia administrators had already increased enforcement of campus rules and opened a new investigative unit to go after allegations of antisemitism and other forms of discrimination. It wasn’t enough to appease the government.
ICE agents were back on Columbia’s campus last week. On Thursday, shortly after the expulsions were announced, another missive came out from the university. Administrators took a softer tone than previous statements:
- “I am writing heartbroken to inform you that we had federal agents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in two university residences tonight,” Katrina Armstrong, Columbia’s interim president, wrote. She added: “I understand the immense stress our community is under.”
- Armstrong said she wouldn’t have allowed the agents into private areas without warrants, but warrants were produced, enabling them to enter the dorms. No one was arrested, she said.
- The Department of Homeland Security shared sparse updates Friday about two other Columbia protesters. One was a Ph.D. student who had her visa revoked this month for being “involved in activities supporting Hamas” and “self-deported” last week. The other, a former student whose visa expired in 2022, was arrested.
Later on Friday, a Justice Department official said the DHS activity was connected to yet another probe of Columbia. The department is investigating whether the university has been “harboring and concealing illegal aliens on its campus,” according to the Associated Press.
The bigger picture: Columbia administrators are doing a delicate dance with the Trump administration. They’re wedged between a government that’s proven unafraid to leverage its vast arsenal of institutional sanctions, and a campus community that is calling for them to fight back and protect students. The courts might eventually scrutinize how Trump’s actions potentially run afoul of laws and regulations, but damage is already being done.
Sure, this is an elite-college spat that in many ways doesn’t reflect the rest of the sector. But how Columbia handles this clash will set the tone for higher education’s relationship with the federal government over the weeks and months to come.
For more from The Chronicle: Can Trump Force Columbia U. to Expel Student Protesters?
The Trump Administration Told Columbia to Put a Department in ‘Academic Receivership.’ What Is That?
An ICE Arrest at Columbia U. Stokes Outrage and Raises Legal Questions