Several of the changes read like trying to thread a needle by giving the Trump administration the bulk of what it wanted without meeting its demands word for word: Columbia’s University Judicial Review Board will not be abolished, as the administration sought, but will instead be reorganized within the provost’s office. Middle Eastern programs aren’t technically subject to the academic receivership the administration wanted.
“At all times, we are guided by our values,” Katrina Armstrong, Columbia’s interim president, wrote, “putting academic freedom, free expression, open inquiry, and respect for all at the fore of every decision we make.”
Columbia faculty members saw it as capitulation. The curricular changes in particular would traditionally be driven by academics on campus, not public negotiations between administrators and federal agencies.
- “It feels like we just gave our values away,” said Kay James, an associate professor of neuroscience and education at Columbia’s Teachers College.
- “Acceding to the Trump administration’s demands is not going to restore the funding,” said Dani Friedrich, an associate professor of curriculum at the college.
Remember: This is no guarantee that the feds will restore the $400 million they yanked. The Trump administration cast its conditions as necessary before it would even start considering releasing the money.
- “We are on the right track now to make sure the final negotiations to unfreeze that money will be in place,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union, according to the Associated Press.
Could Columbia have swallowed the risk of fighting the White House? The Trump administration didn’t follow the process normally required to yank funding over shared-ancestry discrimination.
- The government has enormous leverage over an institution like Columbia, which operates a hospital and a huge federally funded research apparatus. In addition to the $400 million currently at play, the government is reviewing billions more in grants to Columbia, as The Chronicle’s Nell Gluckman reported.
Or did it risk more by not fighting? Right-leaning academics joined in warning that the case is setting a dangerous precedent for all colleges that draw federal dollars.
- “Nobody should suppose that this will stop at Columbia or with the specific academic programs targeted by the government’s letter,” Christopher L. Eisgruber, Princeton University’s president, wrote in The Atlantic. “Universities and their leaders should speak up and litigate forcefully to protect their rights.”
The bigger picture: Other college leaders are keeping their heads down. Last week, The Chronicle contacted 59 colleges that the Trump administration has warned to protect Jewish students, asking how they would respond if they received demands like those Columbia faced. None directly answered the questions, Kate Hidalgo Bellows reports.
📱 Read the full stories from The Chronicle: