“It’s no secret that colleges have exploited the availability of uncapped federal lending and generous forgiveness programs to raise prices rather than improve access and affordability,” Tim Walberg, the committee’s chair, said in his opening remarks at a Tuesday markup session.
Poison pills abound for higher ed. The death of Grad PLUS alone might threaten to close some colleges. It will take time to map out all of the potential perverse incentives that stem from basing funding on metrics like earnings outcomes and loan-repayment rates. Here’s a sample of the early reactions:
- “Making these changes at all would turn the clock back for student access; making them now would result in chaos for both schools and students,” Beth Maglione, interim president and chief executive of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, said in a statement. “This bill would eliminate entire federal student aid programs, significantly reduce eligibility for others, strip protections and flexibilities for struggling borrowers, and remove provisions intended to protect taxpayer dollars.”
- “The proposal to create an institutional risk-sharing process is significantly problematic,” Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, wrote in a letter also signed by several other higher-ed associations. “The committee’s data show that in this risk-sharing proposal, 98 percent of institutions would have a risk-sharing payment and even accounting for PROMISE Grants, 75 percent of institutions would have an overall net loss. This will unduly penalize the very institutions serving the largest numbers of those students who struggle most in the labor market: low income, first generation, and underrepresented student populations.”
This is by no means the final product. To dodge a filibuster, the House and Senate will have to agree on specifics and pass the megabill — with provisions ranging far beyond higher ed — through a process known as reconciliation. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee has yet to release its plans, and the Senate wants to cut far less spending than the House. Some other key changes for colleges, such as increases to the endowment tax, are expected to come from other committees.
The bigger questions: Can colleges lobby to beat back changes that would cause the most problems for students? Can they find anything to like, or at least compromise on? What would colleges cut to offset money lost if these proposals pass?