Does the flip-flopping undercut Columbia’s decision to negotiate with the Trump administration? A thaw had seemed to be emerging between the two sides in recent weeks. That intensified contrasts between Columbia’s strategy and that of Harvard, which has only found itself under intensifying pressure after publicly rejecting Trump-administration demands and embarking on a legal battle.
Columbia’s leaders have been doing image rehab, arguing that they’re protecting independent governance even as they’re working with the Trump administration on goals both sides share, like bulked-up student discipline and more oversight of academics.
- “Following the law and attempting to resolve a complaint is not capitulation,” Claire Shipman, Columbia’s acting president, said in a statement last week, adding: “We engaged in conversations with the government about their concerns — which were and continue to be our concerns and our community’s concerns.”
To be sure, Columbia hasn’t done exactly as the government asked, as The New York Times recently documented. Faced with a set of nine conditions, the university made changes, but with adjustments.
For example, the university said a senior vice provost would review all programs focused on the Middle East for quality and collaboration. The administration had called for placing the small Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African studies department into receivership.
- The chair of the department that’s under fire supports the university. “We are part of a broader review that is a legitimate review,” Gil Hochberg told the Times. Any university would do the same internal review in a similar situation, she added.
But who wants to negotiate like this? If Wednesday was a show of good faith, most college leaders would want it to last more than a few hours. If progress can seemingly unravel so quickly, how can Columbia trust the Trump administration to shake on a deal?
The bigger picture: As much as critics have panned its approach, Columbia was for a brief moment on the brink of becoming the blueprint for bargaining with the Trump administration. U-turns like Wednesday’s mean any eventual compromise will be met with more skepticism from those who fear the Trump administration can’t stick to a deal.
📱 Read Stephanie’s full story: Columbia Got Some NIH Funding Back. Then It Didn’t.