Ukraine in the classroom
When Russia invaded Ukraine, Amy B. Shuffelton of Loyola University Chicago shook up her lesson plans for an honors course she was teaching.
Shuffelton, a professor of cultural and education-policy studies, spent a decade in former Soviet satellite states like Poland and knew her students would be curious about what was happening in Ukraine. After giving a crash course on the history and politics of the region, she had students draw parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and the U.S. government’s historical treatment of Native Americans, which had been that day’s lesson.
“Because the students are terrific, all I had to do was provide the materials and ask the right questions, and they came up with the ideas,” Shuffelton said. “It was a beautiful pedagogical episode.”
In college classrooms across the United States, the war in Ukraine is suddenly on the syllabus. Some professors draw on their own deep expertise in and ties to the region. Sometimes the new lessons slot in easily, in courses about international relations, Russian history, and intelligence studies. But faculty members in fields including composition, linguistics, and American history have also drawn connections to their own disciplines.
Maryann Cusimano Love, an associate professor of international relations at Catholic University, said the war has made theory concrete for students in her peace-studies course. They studied earlier Ukrainian protest movements, in 2004 and 2014, and examined how Ukrainians are practicing principles of nonviolent resistance, such as making direct appeals to end the fighting to Russian soldiers and the Russian public.
“I am a big believer in helping students make sense of disturbing headlines and world events, using the safe space of the classroom and the frames of reference of our coursework to make sense out of what can otherwise seem a confusing cacophony,” Cusimano Love said.
In Laman Tasch’s international-relations class at Southern New Hampshire University, students have been applying theories they have learned in the course to examine different aspects of the war, such as the motivations of the Russian government and the potential impact of international sanctions. David Rivera, a visiting assistant professor of government at Hamilton College, has adjusted his course on domestic Russian politics throughout the semester. As Russian troops massed on the Ukrainian border he did an overview of the history of the Russian empire to help students understand the “imperial nostalgia” that is one of Russian president Vladimir Putin’s reasons for invading Ukraine. A forthcoming lesson on perestroika and the collapse of Soviet communism will focus on the part played by nations like Ukraine then under Soviet control.
At the University of Vermont, students in Susan Munkres’s social-movements class are reading Zeynep Tufekci’s book Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest, an examination of the role of social media in modern-day protest movements, and using it to analyze Ukrainians’ use of social media as well as Russia’s online censorship.
For Jeremy Littau, an associate professor of journalism at Lehigh University, the war has underscored major themes of an introductory course he is teaching this spring, about how media companies determine what news is and how they frame perceptions of events, especially when the public knows little about a topic. As an exercise, he asked students what words they would use in a headline or cable-news chyron to describe the situation in Ukraine — such as war, invasion, conflict, or tragedy — and then discussed how language shapes consumers’ views of the news. Amber Dinquel who teaches freshman college composition at Rappahannock Community College in Virginia has also focused on media coverage of the war as a way to help students develop internet literacy skills.
Ukraine has informed courses in democracy, nationalism, and graduate research methods. Jennifer Eidum, a former Peace Corps volunteer in Ukraine, taught her students about Putin’s rhetoric for war and linguistic differences between Ukrainian and Russian in a sociolinguistics course at Elon University.
Nicholas Sawicki, an art historian at Lehigh, has devoted several class sessions in his 20th-century art course to Ukraine and organized departmentwide discussions. “Anyone can lead a conversation about the war with their students,” Sawicki, a first-generation American whose family is from Ukraine, said. “Even without being a country scholar or area specialist, faculty can do that work, and it can be done critically and thoughtfully. You can guide and inform, from within your own field and the knowledge you have.”
Thanks to everyone who took time to tell me about your approaches to teaching about Ukraine — I only wish I had more space! And thanks to my colleagues at the Teaching newsletter for sharing my call-out. Subscribe to read their weekly insights on improving teaching and learning.