New ranking assesses international-student employability
A new college ranking is rating American institutions on career outcomes for international students.
San Jose State University, in Silicon Valley, tops the list released by F-1 Hire, a company that works to connect international students, who study on F-1 visas, with employment opportunities. Other universities in the top five include Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, Princeton, and Central Michigan.
An institution’s ranking is based on four factors: average salary, the ratio of salary to tuition, the total number of applicants for permanent residency over the past 10 years, and the ratio of total number of international students to number of permanent-residency applicants. The survey, which is based on data collected by the federal government, includes 274 colleges that enrolled at least 500 foreign students in 2023.
There has been growing attention to how well colleges help international graduates, who face more restrictions than their American classmates, navigate the path to a career. But with so many college rankings out there, I asked Andrew Chen, chief executive of F-1 Hire, why create another one. Our exchange has been edited for length and clarity.
Who is the audience for this ranking, and how do you hope they will use your findings?
This ranking is a consumer guide for international students to make education choices in the United States for one of their most significant lifetime investments. I think the main audience is economic-driven international-education seekers.
Your list of highly rated colleges includes Ivy League universities as well as public, often technically focused, colleges. What do you think explains that mix?
Institutions like Stanford, Princeton, and Harvard, which was No. 9, feature highly selective admissions, which significantly improved their career outcomes.
Technically focused universities perform better in this ranking for two reasons: More than 70 percent of U.S. H1-Bs [skilled-worker visas] are issued to STEM majors. And the STEM OPT extension policy [which allows STEM graduates to stay and work for up to three years] gives international STEM graduates more career opportunities than their non-STEM peers.
The highly ranked colleges are diverse. Unlike trying to win a Nobel Prize, any college can make a difference in the career outcomes of its international students. It is not too late to improve.
Did any of the top ranked institutions surprise you?
I didn’t expect 14 out of the top 25 to be R-1 AAU [elite, research-intensive] universities. Those fine American universities are excellent in both academic and career outcomes because of their overall performance, abundant resources, and quality of students.
Four out of the top 10 are regional public universities because of their lower tuition, proximity to major industries, and career-focused services to their students.
The metrics you’ve included reflect outcomes for international students who stay in the United States to work, but many hope an American degree will give them an employability edge in their home countries. Why focus only on students who seek to stay?
Trustworthy career-outcome data sources are very limited. Also, the percentage of international students who want to stay in the United States should be similar across different universities. Unifying the home-country career data across different universities will be tough.
While the primary audience for your ranking is students, what do you hope colleges will take away from your analysis?
American universities, especially public institutions, understand each international student’s economic value is several times that of a domestic student. Therefore, the primary concern of international students, career outcomes, should be addressed as a priority. More instant data, enhanced job-hunting processes, and better tools are necessary for the overloaded career advisers and their eager international students.