Executive orders and a federal-funding freeze spark concern
Eight years ago, President Donald J. Trump imposed a travel ban right out of the gate, halting admission to the United States from a half-dozen largely Muslim countries and throwing thousands of foreign students and scholars into a state of uncertainty.
In his second term, Trump has taken a different approach, issuing an executive order to reinstate heightened vetting of travelers and giving federal agencies 60 days to identify countries that pose such a significant security risk that their citizens should be barred from American soil. Call it travel ban-lite.
The presidential order is part of a flurry of activity in the first days of the new administration that could affect international education, including a pause, announced late Monday, on trillions of dollars of federal spending. Funding for U.S. State Department educational programs, including the flagship Fulbright exchange program, will be affected by the freeze, according to a spreadsheet sent to federal agencies and shared with The Chronicle.
Jill Allen Murray, deputy executive director of public policy for NAFSA: Association of International Educators, said the group is “paying attention to and concerned about the potential implications” of the executive order. It directs the secretaries of state and homeland security, the attorney general, and the director of national intelligence to submit a joint report identifying countries “for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.”
It’s unclear what countries might be included on such a list and whether prohibitions would apply to students, scholars, and researchers. During the first Trump administration, a final version of the travel ban, approved by the U.S. Supreme Court, carved out an exemption for students from Iran.
Another provision of the executive order has raised alarms: It asked federal officials to recommend “any actions necessary” to protect Americans from visa holders who have undermined freedom of speech, called for sectarian violence, or provided “aid, advocacy, or support for foreign terrorists.” There are concerns that order could be used to revoke the visas of international students who take part in pro-Palestinian protests.
Both President Trump and the new secretary of state, Marco Rubio, have called for deporting international students who express support for Palestinians or criticize the Israeli government’s military response in Gaza.
During his recent confirmation hearing, Rubio, a former Florida senator, said he would be “very forceful” on the issue of revoking visas of Hamas supporters or denying them entry to the United States in the first place.
Murray said it was premature to determine the impact of the executive order and other early policy announcements on colleges and their international students since many of the officials who will be responsible for enacting them aren’t yet on the job.
NAFSA has set up a webpage to track executive and regulatory actions by the new administration, which Murray said is updated multiple times a day. The group is also holding webinars on policy issues.
Meanwhile, several states filed suits to stop the sudden pause on federal funding, which had been set to take effect Tuesday evening. (A federal judge blocked it from taking effect until Monday, February 3.) The administration has said the freeze was needed in order to conduct an across-the-board ideological review of loans, grants, and other government spending.
In an email, Mark Overmann, executive director of the Alliance for International Exchange, confirmed that the freeze would apply to programs run by the State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs such as the Gilman International Scholarship program, which expands study-abroad opportunities for low-income and first-generation American students, and EducationUSA, a global network of centers that advise international students about studying at American colleges.
The status of spending on some international work has already been in question because of an earlier pause, announced last week, on foreign aid. Some researchers told The Chronicle that they had been instructed to stop work on overseas projects.