With border restrictions, Iranian students’ future is “blurry”
When President Trump issued an order last week barring travelers, including students and scholars, from a dozen countries from coming to the United States, Sam had been waiting more than a year for her student visa.
The new travel ban, which blocks all visitors from Iran, could quash her hopes of studying in America. “I feel overwhelmed, and honestly, the future is blurry for me,” said the student, whom The Chronicle is identifying by a nickname because of her fears about the repercussions of speaking out.
Sam had twice deferred her admission to a master’s program in chemistry at Texas Tech University while her application went through an onerous screening process, known as administrative processing, that is practically automatic for Iranians. Now, she said, “I must either choose another country or give up on my academic goals.”
The border restrictions are the latest blow landed by the Trump administration on international education. On the same day, the president signed a proclamation freezing entry to the United States for Harvard students and scholars, an attempted end run around a federal judge’s ruling that the government could not revoke the university’s authorization to participate in the student-visa system.
In recent weeks, the administration has threatened to “aggressively” cancel Chinese students’ visas, terminated (and later restored) the legal status of thousands of foreign students, and suspended new student-visa interviews worldwide — at the busiest time of the year for college applicants. Collectively, the actions have left international students and American colleges reeling.
While many of the directives have come as a surprise, Trump had long signaled plans to reimpose a travel ban, a policy from his first term in office. The new measure, which took effect on Monday, limits travel from an additional seven countries and specifically suspends student and scholar visas. The administration cited national-security reasons for the restrictions.
Of the countries included in the ban, Iran is the most significant for higher education. Nearly 12,500 Iranian students currently study on American campuses, and they enroll disproportionately in graduate programs and in STEM fields, amplifying the impact of the new restrictions. The 2017 version of the ban had exempted students from Iran.
The latest ban applies to foreign citizens who are outside the United States and do not have a valid visa. Yet it has caused consternation among current Iranian students. Because students from Iran are typically issued a single-entry visa — most students are given visas good for the duration of their studies — the new restrictions mean that they will be barred from returning if they leave the United States.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst had been planning for a potential travel ban throughout the spring and was able to quickly notify those affected, said Kalpen Trivedi, vice provost for global affairs. No current students or faculty members were stuck outside the country when the ban went into effect.
But supporting incoming students is another matter. UMass may be able to accommodate some undergraduate students denied entry, the largest group of which is from Myanmar, at study-abroad sites overseas, a strategy the university employed during the pandemic. Remote learning isn’t an option, however, for graduate students, in part because of federal rules governing research in certain scientific fields.
“We’re trying to stay a step or two ahead of an unpredictable administration,” Trivedi said.
Iranian students have started a letter-writing campaign to public officials and journalists, urging that the ban be lifted or revisited. Many, like Sam, said they had not engaged in any political activity.
Saeed had been set to start a Ph.D. program at Montana Technological University, one of two institutions that offered him full scholarships. His particular interest is in groundwater remediation, and at the American colleges, he could find professors pursuing similar research.
Saeed hoped his work could help deal with environmental problems globally. “It is strictly scientific and nonsensitive,” he said, “with no security implications.”
Hossein had spent years studying, improving his English, and saving money to pursue a master’s degree in health care management at George Washington University. He was attracted to education in the United States because of its quality and because it offers programs that combine practical skills, policy expertise, and public service.
George Washington had deferred his admission to the spring semester, but even if the ban was removed, Hossein worried that scholarships and courses would no longer be available. He is thinking about applying to programs in Canada or Europe, but because deadlines have passed, he would need to delay his education by another year. And neither, he said, was his first choice. “Everything is on pause with no timeline or transparency.”
Blanket restrictions based on citizenship ignore individual merit, said Hossein. “The emotional toll of being rejected not because of anything I did, but because of my nationality, is incredibly disheartening.”
Meanwhile, Harvard won a temporary halt to the international-admissions freeze after the university amended an earlier lawsuit against the Trump administration to include the most-recent directive.
And the president seemed to retreat from his administration’s plan to revoke the visas of Chinese students who had ties to the Communist Party or were studying in unnamed sensitive fields.
“Chinese students are coming. No problem,” Trump said during a White House briefing. “It’s our honor to have them.”
I’ll be joining The Chronicle’s free monthly webinar series on the Trump administration’s impact on higher education to talk about all the recent developments affecting international ed. To join us on Thursday, June 12, at 1 p.m. ET, register here.