Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
TheEdgeIcon.png

The Edge

The world is changing. Is higher ed ready to change with it? Senior Writer Scott Carlson helps you better understand higher ed’s accelerating evolution. Delivered every Thursday. To read this newsletter as soon as it sends, sign up to receive it in your email inbox.

February 16, 2022
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email

From: Goldie Blumenstyk

Subject: The Edge: Whatever Became of 2014’s ‘Opportunity’ Goals?

I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed.

We’re doing some innovating of our own here at The Edge. Each week I will share my latest thinking on the people and ideas reshaping higher ed, alternating between my own reporting and my picks for thought-provoking and useful stories and resources from other organizations. I’ll also mix in some quick takes, noteworthy quotes, and stats that catch my eye, as well as occasional contributions from my colleagues.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed.

We’re doing some innovating of our own here at The Edge. Each week I will share my latest thinking on the people and ideas reshaping higher ed, alternating between my own reporting and my picks for thought-provoking and useful stories and resources from other organizations. I’ll also mix in some quick takes, noteworthy quotes, and stats that catch my eye, as well as occasional contributions from my colleagues.

This week I report lessons from looking back on the promises made at a 2014 White House summit on higher ed.

Those White House summits on “educational opportunity” left many missing links.

A White House summit is a great way to galvanize attention. But it’s not the best tool for carrying through a big idea like expanding educational opportunity.

That was the first lesson I took from a new, informal analysis of progress on commitments that were part of the Obama administration’s effort in 2014 to promote college access and success for underrepresented students. You remember that, right? Big to-dos at the White House in January and December of that year. Hundreds of colleges and higher-ed organizations falling all over themselves to be included. If you need a refresher, check out the summaries here and here.

A look back — seven years on — offers some interesting lessons and perspective on what was top of mind for college leaders at the time.

    The letdown I’m feeling isn’t because the pledges to improve graduation rates and other metrics by 2020 came up empty. In fact, the policy expert who oversaw the analysis, Terri Taylor from the Lumina Foundation, told me there “was actually a little more to celebrate” than she anticipated.

    Nonetheless, the analysis highlights how those Obama summits were a missed opportunity. To be sure, having just lived through four years of a president who openly disdained higher education, I don’t take for granted a White House that holds the sector to high expectations. But encouraging colleges to set high bars isn’t likely to work if there’s nothing to hold them accountable. Whether at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or in a nondescript college boardroom, goal-setting exercises are meaningless if they don’t involve mechanisms for tracking progress — ideally ones that are transparent about outcomes.

    I’m grateful to Taylor and her crew of Lumina interns for picking up where the White House left off and for sharing the findings with me. Their work came in response to my offhand plea last summer for some accounting of all those pledges.

    Of course, many findings come with caveats, and in this case, the analysis covers only the pledges from the second summit, said Taylor, Lumina’s strategy director for innovation and discovery. The interns looked only at public sources, like colleges’ websites and annual reports, to gauge progress, and didn’t directly contact institutions or organizations or conduct a more rigorous analysis to estimate the impact of the summit. Because of those limitations, Taylor has allowed me to share findings from the analysis but asked me not to publish it in its entirety.

    Still, it’s the only analysis I know of. So what did it reveal?

    Well for starters, just a few summit participants had publicly reported their progress. And even they tended to use different language or metrics to describe their goals for access and attainment over time. That made it difficult to track their efforts. Some colleges, at the Department of Education’s urging, had developed their goals collectively in state, regional, or local consortia. But while those collaborations were “laudable,” as Taylor put it, the consortia often lacked an online presence where their progress could be discerned.

    None of that is to say the summits didn’t have value. They do appear to have spurred action, even if it was hard to quantify, said Taylor. “Access and attainment remain high priorities for most, if not all, of the participants.” But while the White House can “get people’s attention,” she added (especially when new administrations come in), “it’s not a very good longitudinal-tracking organization” — especially for a sector whose basic unit of measure is a six-year graduation rate.

    So what about the goals?

    Because the analysis wasn’t comprehensive, I hesitate to devote too much space to highlighting wins and misses, but sharing some of that seems useful:

    • The University Innovation Alliance was singled out for a highly detailed analysis of its commitment to increase the number of graduates by 68,000, which it exceeded in six years. (Recently the UIA reported updated figures showing that its 11 founding members have now produced a total of 97,000 degrees over their baseline and are on track to double their initial goal by 2025. Notably, the proportion of their graduates from low-income families is rising faster than the increase in graduates over all.)
    • The California State University system, which pledged to have 34,951 more graduates by 2020 and 100,792 by 2025 (both oddly specific goals, numerically speaking) didn’t have readily available data on that goal. But it has published data showing that its graduation rates have increased since 2015.
    • The 12-member Louisiana Community and Technical College System didn’t hit its goal of producing 20,000 more graduates by 2020, but was “very transparent” in reporting on that shortfall, while also noting some successes on other 2020 goals. (Only about half of the pledges made by two-year institutions were trackable using publicly available data, the Lumina team found.)

    The foundation didn’t exempt itself or fellow education philanthropies from scrutiny. Its White House pledge centered on a $700,000 grant program aimed at making seven so-called completion colleges easier to navigate for military veterans and other adult students. At the time, that effort fell under a grant-making category meant to increase the “productivity” of colleges. Taylor told me that Lumina no longer uses that term, although the foundation still considers those goals in its grant-making. I realized I haven’t heard the term much myself lately, either.

    That wasn’t the only time-capsule moment the analysis revealed. Another: Attention to equity “was present but not as central as it would be today,” Taylor said. The same goes for adult students.

    Many of the ambitions for increasing college completion eight years ago were based on encouraging students toward self-directed academic programs — recall that 2014 was also when competency-based education was first gaining steam — while today many institutions are promoting a more focused, guided-pathways approach.

    All of which got me wondering: What goals that institutions are setting today will still feel important and relevant seven or 10 years from now? When we look back, will current commitments seem faddish or enduring? And in light of our societal challenges, what goals should colleges be setting? I’d love to hear from you on any of those questions. Please send me your thoughts. My email is below.

    Quote of the week.

    “One of several alarming deficiencies exposed by the Covid pandemic is the extent of our scientific illiteracy. What should have been a new Sputnik moment instead convinced a sizable number of folks that vaccines will make them sterile, magnetic, or satanic.” —Ron Charles, book critic for The Washington Post, in his “Book Club” weekly newsletter, introducing books recently honored for science writing.

    Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, find them here. To receive your own copy, free, register here. If you want to follow me on Twitter, @GoldieStandard is my handle.

    Goldie’s Weekly Picks

    Photo illustration showing a paper map of a college campus being torn up and folded into tree shapes.
    Reimagining Space
    The Overbuilt Campus
    By Lee Gardner
    After a yearslong surge in construction, colleges retrench and retool.
    Photo illustration of paper arrows pointing in all directions
    The Trends Report
    4 Emerging Trends You Should Know About
    Keep an eye out for these developments percolating across higher ed.
    6807 expertise golden cosmos fullbleed.jpg
    The Review | Opinion
    The Accreditation System Is Broken
    By Michael Itzkowitz
    Lax standards threaten higher education’s credibility.
    Tags
    Leadership & Governance Innovation & Transformation Finance & Operations Law & Policy
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    More News

    Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
    Iced Out
    The Death of Shared Governance
    Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
    'A New Era'
    Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
    Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
    Endowment funds
    The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
    WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
    Campus Activism
    An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

    From The Review

    Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
    The Review | Essay
    Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
    By Jason Owen-Smith
    Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
    The Review | Essay
    How Are Students Really Using AI?
    By Derek O'Connell
    John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
    The Review | Essay
    100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
    By John K. Wilson

    Upcoming Events

    07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
    Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
    Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
    What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
    Lead With Insight
    • Explore Content
      • Latest News
      • Newsletters
      • Letters
      • Free Reports and Guides
      • Professional Development
      • Events
      • Chronicle Store
      • Chronicle Intelligence
      • Jobs in Higher Education
      • Post a Job
    • Know The Chronicle
      • About Us
      • Vision, Mission, Values
      • DEI at The Chronicle
      • Write for Us
      • Work at The Chronicle
      • Our Reporting Process
      • Advertise With Us
      • Brand Studio
      • Accessibility Statement
    • Account and Access
      • Manage Your Account
      • Manage Newsletters
      • Individual Subscriptions
      • Group and Institutional Access
      • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Get Support
      • Contact Us
      • Reprints & Permissions
      • User Agreement
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • California Privacy Policy
      • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
    © 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
    The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
    Follow Us
    • twitter
    • instagram
    • youtube
    • facebook
    • linkedin