Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Administration

Campuses Strive for Compliance and Fairness in Policies on Sexual Assault

By Sara Lipka June 6, 2011
Arne Duncan, secretary of education, looks on as Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. pauses at the U. of New Hampshire while discussing the Education Department’s new guidelines for colleges on dealing with allegations of sexual misconduct.
Arne Duncan, secretary of education, looks on as Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. pauses at the U. of New Hampshire while discussing the Education Department’s new guidelines for colleges on dealing with allegations of sexual misconduct.Cheryl Senter, AP Images

For a new edict repeating old rules, the U.S. Education Department’s “Dear Colleague” letter on sexual violence has caused quite a stir. Two months after it went out, several colleges have already announced new policies or plans for revision.

Things happen fast when the vice president of the United States heralds guidelines at a news conference. “Rape is rape is rape,” Joseph R. Biden Jr. said at the University of New Hampshire on April 4. “The sooner universities make that clear, the sooner we’ll begin to make progress.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

For a new edict repeating old rules, the U.S. Education Department’s “Dear Colleague” letter on sexual violence has caused quite a stir. Two months after it went out, several colleges have already announced new policies or plans for revision.

Things happen fast when the vice president of the United States heralds guidelines at a news conference. “Rape is rape is rape,” Joseph R. Biden Jr. said at the University of New Hampshire on April 4. “The sooner universities make that clear, the sooner we’ll begin to make progress.”

The letter reiterates, sometimes verbatim, the department’s decade-old sexual-harassment guidance and echoes its statements to individual colleges over the years: They must have transparent, prompt procedures to investigate and resolve complaints of sexual misconduct, protecting the rights of alleged victims.

But never before had officials ruled so loudly on Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination at institutions that receive federal funds. College counsels counted “shalls” and “musts” and witnessed the department’s simultaneous investigations of Harvard and Yale. Its revitalized, emboldened Office for Civil Rights was doing what it said it would: stepping up enforcement of antidiscrimination law.

“We’re finding cases where sometimes, unbeknownst to university officials, … the victims are being further victimized by the process,” Russlynn H. Ali, assistant secretary for civil rights, said at one of a few news conferences. “Our guidance seeks to help change that.”

Burden of Proof

Most notably, the letter ratifies prior recommendations for a relatively low burden of proof—"more likely than not"—in cases involving sexual misconduct, including assault. Several colleges have since issued statements, some of them from presidents, that their policies are now in line with the federal guidance, or soon will be: Brandeis University, the College of William & Mary, Stanford University, Yale. Some colleges have also said they will allow complainants, not just respondents, to appeal findings.

Higher-education groups have either applauded or winced as debates over compliance and fairness flare.

Victims needed more protections, says Brett A. Sokolow, president of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management, a consultancy. “Balancing the process happens to favor the complainants at this point, because they’re the ones who have been historically disfavored.”

The letter says, for example, that colleges should “minimize the burden on the complainant,” transferring alleged perpetrators, if necessary, away from shared courses or housing. The advocacy groups Security on Campus and the American Association of University Women have praised the guidelines and ensuing changes in campus policies.

“Institutions will be much more responsive to victims’ needs,” says S. Daniel Carter, director of public policy for Security on Campus.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other observers have decried what they see as a swing toward victim advocacy. A paragraph from the department’s 2001 guidelines, under the heading “Due Process Rights of the Accused,” became a sentence in the new letter. That doesn’t strike a balance but tips it, says William Creeley, director of legal and public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a free-speech group.

“We are hopeful that some university will say, ‘Hey, wait a minute, we think this is going too far,’” he says. But that is unlikely, he says: Nobody wants to challenge a campaign to end sexual violence.

‘Fair and Balanced’

Colleges, proclaiming safe learning environments, are applying the rules. Where confusion had lingered, federal expectations are now plain, says Susan M. Davis, associate vice president for student affairs at the University of Virginia. “For good or bad, the ‘Dear Colleague’ letter is pretty prescriptive.”

Virginia began revising its sexual-misconduct policies in December. Campus officials proposed a series of changes, including more assistance for victims; tighter definitions of “effective consent” and “incapacitation”; and a broader scope of offenses, such as cyberstalking and knowingly passing a sexually transmitted infection to another person. The university solicited feedback from experts and, through a Web site, comments from students, parents, and others.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was during this process that the Education Department released its letter, and Virginia accordingly made a couple of changes it otherwise might not have. For one, it will no longer mediate between two parties in cases of sexual assault. The letter reiterates prior guidance to specific campuses on that point. “In cases involving allegations of sexual assault,” it says, “mediation is not appropriate even on a voluntary basis.”

But some victims request mediation—and won’t report or pursue allegations any other way, says Ms. Davis, a former associate general counsel at Virginia who has been investigating sexual-misconduct cases there since 2005. “That will be distressing,” she says.

University officials had considered changing their standard of proof, “clear and convincing evidence,” for finding students responsible; the letter decided that question. Virginia will now move to “preponderance of the evidence” (i.e., “more likely than not”), which the letter aligns with precedent for civil-rights law.

Of course a lower evidentiary standard implies that more students accused of sexual misconduct will be found responsible. “We have our work cut out for us,” Ms. Davis says, “to convince some students that this will be a fair and balanced process.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Several colleges, in adopting the Education Department’s prior recommendations, had already lowered the burden of proof. Still, many kept using “clear and convincing,” and some, like Stanford, applied the criminal standard, “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Colleges and Courts

Regardless of where it’s set, an evidentiary standard dictated by the federal government treats colleges like courts, says Ada Meloy, general counsel of the American Council on Education. And it limits their autonomy, she argues, at a time when many institutions have sought to make their conduct processes less legalistic.

The letter also orders comprehensive investigations into cases of alleged sexual misconduct, a requirement that worries some campus officials, says Ms. Meloy, who is sharing those concerns with the Education Department. Virginia and the University of Colorado began conducting such investigations several years ago in efforts to bring fairness and rigor to such cases. But small private institutions and community colleges, Ms. Meloy says, lack the necessary staff and resources.

Even a robust staff may not have skills in evaluating evidence and witnesses’ credibility, says Gina M. Smith, a lawyer in Philadelphia who works with colleges on sexual-misconduct policies. “These things are hard for courts and trained prosecutors,” she points out. A footnote to the department’s letter specifies that a “trained forensic examiner” should review evidence.

ADVERTISEMENT

In this new era of enforcement, training will become even more vital—for students, faculty, and staff who investigate and decide sexual-misconduct charges, and for Title IX coordinators, whose role the letter outlines. Policies enshrine principles and intentions, but actual cases turn on personal interactions and judgment calls.

To guide those, Virginia has identified dual missions: “providing the utmost in care and support for victims while at the same time being mindful of the due process and privacy rights of accused students,” Patricia M. Lampkin, vice president and chief student-affairs officer, said in a statement.

Under new policies next fall, colleges will strive to comply with federal guidance and remain fair to all parties. If students find fault, they will, as ever, sue. In emulating courts, colleges also have to satisfy them.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Lipka_Sara.jpg
About the Author
Sara Lipka
Sara Lipka works to develop editorial products in different formats that connect deeply with our audience. Follow her on Twitter @chronsara, or email her at sara.lipka@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
Wednesday, June 11, 2025 Tucson, Arizona—Doctor Andrew Capaldi poses for a portrait at his lab at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona on Wednesday, June 11, 2025. CREDIT: Ash Ponders for Chronicle
Capaldi Lab—
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan
Photo-based illustration of a student and a professor, each occupying a red circle in a landscape of scribbles.
The Review | Opinion
Meet Students Where They Are? Maybe Not.
By Mark Horowitz

Upcoming Events

Chronfest25_Virtual-Events_Page_862x574.png
Chronicle Festival: Innovation Amid Uncertainty
07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin