Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
students-decide-full-bleed.jpg
Pat Kinsella for The Chronicle

Colleges Are Endangering Students Like Me

They want us back. But they haven’t lived up to their public-health promises.

The Review
By Andrew V. Lorenzen August 23, 2020

Across the country, hundreds of colleges and universities are letting students decide if they want to return to campus this fall. Theoretically, this gives students a range of options and allows them to take their education and health into consideration. In practice, however, there’s an exploitative power dynamic in play, one that puts students in an unfair — and unsafe — position.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Across the country, hundreds of colleges and universities are letting students decide if they want to return to campus this fall. Theoretically, this gives students a range of options and allows them to take their education and health into consideration. In practice, however, there’s an exploitative power dynamic in play, one that puts students in an unfair — and unsafe — position.

Cornell University, where I am a student, laid out its plan in The Wall Street Journal in late June, arguing that reopening campus was safer for us than moving courses online. Relying on survey data taken earlier that month, prior to a wave of Covid-19 breakouts, the president and provost contended in the op-ed that students would return regardless of Cornell’s decision, and that student behavior could not be regulated without an in-person reopening featuring robust testing and social-distancing protocols.

Despite those precautions, returning to campus holds real risk for students. Cornell’s model indicates that hundreds of us will be infected in the rosiest scenario, over 1,000 under expected conditions, and more than 5,000 in the most pessimistic scenario. While Cornell created sweeping safety policies to keep us safe, it would be naïve to expect that all students will follow all these rules all the time.

And for the model’s more optimistic predictions to hold predictive value, preconditions must be implemented effectively. That has not happened. Cornell promised to provide quarantine housing to students arriving from states on the New York travel-advisory list but reversed its decision just before students began arriving. Those students were forced to either remake their travel plans to quarantine elsewhere and arrive later, take on the financial burden of a two-week hotel stay, or even worse, break the state-directed quarantine. Meanwhile, Cornell’s resident advisers have had to threaten a strike to demand the absolute reopening necessities, such as PPE and clear communication about pandemic-related additions to their duties. Colleges across the country are facing similar challenges.

students-decide.jpg
Pat Kinsella for The Chronicle

The reality is that there will be outbreaks even in best-case scenarios. Some students will get sick. Some of them will be hospitalized. And, as recent research tells us, some will have long-term health ramifications as a result of their illness.

That leaves thousands of college students in the difficult position of deciding whether the educational value of returning to campus is worth the health risk. For some, returning home in the spring meant returning to difficult family dynamics that strained their mental health. For others, returning home meant being put at an academic disadvantage due to a lack of computer or internet access. And for many more, myself included, returning home simply ran contrary to everything we hoped to receive from a collegiate experience.

The truth is that we all desperately want to return. And that desperation is part of the problem. When administrators put the option of returning on the table, students will leap at the chance. But as the virus spreads, and as the preconditions that all the elaborate modeling was based on fail to be met, that choice has become profoundly dangerous.

To make matters worse, students lack the necessary information to make good decisions. How can we weigh the options when we don’t even know what our classes will be? Why were we expected to commit ourselves to returning several weeks ago when we only just received our financial-aid packages last week? There is a two-pronged failure at work here. First, administrators have failed to implement the basic public-health measures they promised to students. Second, the lack of information available to students has prevented us from thinking critically about this decision and making a true cost-benefit analysis. We can’t take the administration at its word, yet we also don’t have enough information to make an informed, independent choice.

Colleges are in a difficult position, and I don’t think they are intentionally trying to exploit us. But we have to acknowledge the exploitative potential at play: Colleges are forcing students to decide to return with minimal information. Such a dynamic doesn’t create a real choice for students; it makes them an offer they can’t refuse.

I decided early this summer to return to campus in the fall. I kept wondering whether I was making a mistake, but I felt like I had no choice. With so little information and the fear of being put at a disadvantage without face-to-face interaction with my professors and peers, I had resigned myself to a decision largely made for me. But as I grew increasingly concerned about the infection risk in Ithaca and the prospect of leaving behind my at-risk parents in Florida, I changed course and decided to remain home.

Regardless of the choice each of us makes this fall, colleges have a responsibility to make sure students understand the risks involved in this decision and that they have the space, support, and information to make a real choice. We deserve that.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Andrew V. Lorenzen
Andrew V. Lorenzen is a rising junior at Cornell University.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin