> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
students-decide-full-bleed.jpg

Colleges Are Endangering Students Like Me

They want us back. But they haven’t lived up to their public-health promises.

Pat Kinsella for The Chronicle
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print
By  Andrew V. Lorenzen
August 23, 2020

Across the country, hundreds of colleges and universities are letting students decide if they want to return to campus this fall. Theoretically, this gives students a range of options and allows them to take their education and health into consideration. In practice, however, there’s an exploitative power dynamic in play, one that puts students in an unfair — and unsafe — position.

Cornell University, where I am a student, laid out its plan in The Wall Street Journal in late June, arguing that reopening campus was safer for us than moving courses online. Relying on survey data taken earlier that month, prior to a wave of Covid-19 breakouts, the president and provost contended in the op-ed that students would return regardless of Cornell’s decision, and that student behavior could not be regulated without an in-person reopening featuring robust testing and social-distancing protocols.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Across the country, hundreds of colleges and universities are letting students decide if they want to return to campus this fall. Theoretically, this gives students a range of options and allows them to take their education and health into consideration. In practice, however, there’s an exploitative power dynamic in play, one that puts students in an unfair — and unsafe — position.

Cornell University, where I am a student, laid out its plan in The Wall Street Journal in late June, arguing that reopening campus was safer for us than moving courses online. Relying on survey data taken earlier that month, prior to a wave of Covid-19 breakouts, the president and provost contended in the op-ed that students would return regardless of Cornell’s decision, and that student behavior could not be regulated without an in-person reopening featuring robust testing and social-distancing protocols.

Despite those precautions, returning to campus holds real risk for students. Cornell’s model indicates that hundreds of us will be infected in the rosiest scenario, over 1,000 under expected conditions, and more than 5,000 in the most pessimistic scenario. While Cornell created sweeping safety policies to keep us safe, it would be naïve to expect that all students will follow all these rules all the time.

And for the model’s more optimistic predictions to hold predictive value, preconditions must be implemented effectively. That has not happened. Cornell promised to provide quarantine housing to students arriving from states on the New York travel-advisory list but reversed its decision just before students began arriving. Those students were forced to either remake their travel plans to quarantine elsewhere and arrive later, take on the financial burden of a two-week hotel stay, or even worse, break the state-directed quarantine. Meanwhile, Cornell’s resident advisers have had to threaten a strike to demand the absolute reopening necessities, such as PPE and clear communication about pandemic-related additions to their duties. Colleges across the country are facing similar challenges.

students-decide.jpg
Pat Kinsella for The Chronicle

The reality is that there will be outbreaks even in best-case scenarios. Some students will get sick. Some of them will be hospitalized. And, as recent research tells us, some will have long-term health ramifications as a result of their illness.

ADVERTISEMENT

That leaves thousands of college students in the difficult position of deciding whether the educational value of returning to campus is worth the health risk. For some, returning home in the spring meant returning to difficult family dynamics that strained their mental health. For others, returning home meant being put at an academic disadvantage due to a lack of computer or internet access. And for many more, myself included, returning home simply ran contrary to everything we hoped to receive from a collegiate experience.

The truth is that we all desperately want to return. And that desperation is part of the problem. When administrators put the option of returning on the table, students will leap at the chance. But as the virus spreads, and as the preconditions that all the elaborate modeling was based on fail to be met, that choice has become profoundly dangerous.

To make matters worse, students lack the necessary information to make good decisions. How can we weigh the options when we don’t even know what our classes will be? Why were we expected to commit ourselves to returning several weeks ago when we only just received our financial-aid packages last week? There is a two-pronged failure at work here. First, administrators have failed to implement the basic public-health measures they promised to students. Second, the lack of information available to students has prevented us from thinking critically about this decision and making a true cost-benefit analysis. We can’t take the administration at its word, yet we also don’t have enough information to make an informed, independent choice.

Colleges are in a difficult position, and I don’t think they are intentionally trying to exploit us. But we have to acknowledge the exploitative potential at play: Colleges are forcing students to decide to return with minimal information. Such a dynamic doesn’t create a real choice for students; it makes them an offer they can’t refuse.

I decided early this summer to return to campus in the fall. I kept wondering whether I was making a mistake, but I felt like I had no choice. With so little information and the fear of being put at a disadvantage without face-to-face interaction with my professors and peers, I had resigned myself to a decision largely made for me. But as I grew increasingly concerned about the infection risk in Ithaca and the prospect of leaving behind my at-risk parents in Florida, I changed course and decided to remain home.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regardless of the choice each of us makes this fall, colleges have a responsibility to make sure students understand the risks involved in this decision and that they have the space, support, and information to make a real choice. We deserve that.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Opinion
Andrew V. Lorenzen
Andrew V. Lorenzen is a rising junior at Cornell University.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin