Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
News

Ed Tech’s Next Wave Rolls Into View

By Roger Novak September 15, 2014
Ed Tech’s Next Wave Rolls Into View 1
David Plunkert for The Chronicle

In my 25-plus years as an early-stage venture capitalist investing in education technology, I have been fortunate to fund several successful and important companies. This experience has given me a unique perch from which to notice emerging patterns in the ed-tech world. While pattern recognition is imprecise at best, I subscribe to the analysis made in the Malcolm Gladwell book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking: You know it when you see it. I think we are about to embark on the third, and probably most transformative, wave of ed-tech companies and new learning technologies.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In my 25-plus years as an early-stage venture capitalist investing in education technology, I have been fortunate to fund several successful and important companies. This experience has given me a unique perch from which to notice emerging patterns in the ed-tech world. While pattern recognition is imprecise at best, I subscribe to the analysis made in the Malcolm Gladwell book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking: You know it when you see it. I think we are about to embark on the third, and probably most transformative, wave of ed-tech companies and new learning technologies.

The first transformative phase of revolutionary ed tech (not including computer-based training) was driven by the wiring of the campus, first with cable and later by connecting everyone to the Internet—or, as the process was called back then, a port per pillow. It started in earnest in the 1990s and is essentially complete today. This wave enabled learning-management systems like Blackboard, WebCT, Angel Learning, Desire2Learn, and several open-source projects, like Moodle and Sakai, to emerge. That wave was all about connecting students, teachers, and the university.


NEXT: The Quest for Student Success

Read the full report on innovation in academe, focused on formulas for student success.


When my company, Novak Biddle Venture Partners, backed Blackboard in 1997, its co-founders, Matthew Pittinsky and Michael Chasen, were already talking about the web and its potential to change the way education and learning could be delivered. My partners and I often fantasized about an end state in which professors would be free agents and education could become “unbundled” from the traditional campus setting and offered more freely as a consumer service, or commodity, by other providers.

The second ed-tech wave was enabled largely by a confluence of technologies that burst upon the scene one after another. This wave brought increasing wired and wireless bandwidth and speed, very smart devices, social platforms, and, more recently, cloud computing. It gave rise to exciting companies like 2U and UniversityNow, along with MOOC platforms like Coursera, Udacity, and edX. These companies have, in fact, driven the unbundling of higher education. In some cases this trend allowed universities to increase access and revenues without a commensurate rise in costs. In others, it managed to reduce the cost of a degree. And it has improved access for all by providing a way to deliver education to almost anyone, anywhere, to any device at any time. The second ed-tech wave also gave a big boost to lifelong learning.

While the first two waves helped improve educational delivery and access, it has been well documented that they came with some pedagogical weaknesses. It became clear that growing numbers of new college students were arriving on campuses unprepared—academically, socially, and emotionally. Whether it was because of inadequate schooling, shifting demographics that have led more financially needy, first-generation, and minority students to apply to college, or other factors, many colleges have been unable to provide the support those students need.

During this time, we experienced a mini ed-tech wave—I call it Wave 1.75-2.5—of companies that developed early-warning systems and new types of technological support to reduce retention problems and improve poor achievement levels.

This was not a transformative wave but more of a prescriptive wave, and is still in effect. It has included companies like InsideTrack, Starfish Retention Solutions, and Civitas Learning, which provide coaching and data analytics to assess which students are at risk and offer interventions to keep them on track.

At the same time, another set of companies, which offered adaptive-learning engines, began focusing on personalized learning. Among them were Carnegie Learning and, more recently, Knewton and Smart Sparrow, as well as online tutoring companies. All of these worked with the existing learning platforms.

Though our portfolio selection has not been flawless, our firm has been fortunate to have its share of ed-tech “winners.” Besides backing Blackboard, which then bought WebCT, Angel, and others, we have invested in 2U, UniversityNow, Starfish, Parchment, and Fidelis Education. (I previously served as lead director at Blackboard, and currently serve on the boards of Fidelis, Parchment, and UniversityNow.)

I now believe that a new wave is appearing on the horizon and is going to be even larger and more transformative. I think this third wave could help drive a re-engineering of the university, leading to what the late W. Edwards Deming, a guru of quality management, might have called a systems approach to student success. If the second wave was about the unbundling of colleges and providing learning as a service, the third wave of companies will be involved in reassembling educational component pieces from various sources to help make students’ learning portfolios more meaningful to both individuals and employers. While we are starting to see colleges taking similar steps to become more student-centered, private-sector companies can act nimbly to fill gaps and create new technologies to help accomplish these goals.

With a nod to all the caveats about pattern recognition, I am seeing the development of a new set of traits that I believe will typify the next wave of ed-tech entrants. I think the most successful companies will offer technologies to reach goals like these:

  • Put student achievement and learning outcomes at front and center. Factors like seat time (time spent in the classroom) and instructor credentials will be less important to a student’s academic career, and in some cases meaningless. This could lead to new forms of courses and institutional accreditation.
  • Help students develop a personal learning plan and set of goals aligned with their vision for their education and their lives.
  • Provide tools to help students develop relationships with multiple mentors. Connective systems will blur as students have better ways to find mentors, who might include professors, peers, experts in their field of study, alumni, and even potential employers. These mentors can help monitor students’ progress, offer suggestions for course correction and improvement, and help establish expectations for lifelong learning.
  • Develop new kinds of global credentials that can be used to find talented people to fill jobs. These credentials will be managed by the students themselves, through secure sites and exchanges like Parchment, which helps students, employers, and others send and receive education credentials online.

Such developments could improve cooperation between colleges and the business sector by closing gaps in education skills and encouraging new partnerships. All of this will occur on a more global scale, as the projected demand for talented workers grows in the coming decades. An early-stage company that has embraced many of these traits is Fidelis, which provides a platform that allows students to manage learning relationships with their college, mentors, and others. There are probably many more such companies in the ranks.

As a gray-haired ed-tech investor, I can only say I wish I were 20 years younger. Because from where I sit today, the future looks extraordinarily exciting.

Read other items in NEXT: The Quest for Student Success.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Hoover-NBERValue-0516 002 B
Diminishing Returns
Why the College Premium Is Shrinking for Low-Income Students
Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin