Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Athletics

‘Everybody Is Floundering’: Colleges Scramble to Adapt to a World Where Their Athletes Can Cash In

By Eric Kelderman June 7, 2021
Texas Longhorns quarterback Sam Ehlinger (11) takes a selfie with a fan as he leaves the field following the college football game between the Texas Longhorns and the West Virginia Mountaineers on October 5, 2019, at Mountaineer Field at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, WV.
A U. of Texas at Austin football player takes a selfie with a fan as he leaves the field following a game in October 2019.Frank Jansky, Icon Sportswire, Getty Images

In less than a month, new laws in seven states will effectively pierce the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s ban on paying student-athletes — one of the starkest shifts in big-time college sports in a century.

Starting in July, colleges in those states will be barred from prohibiting their athletes from earning money based on their affiliation with sports. The new laws, which fly in the face of the NCAA’s longtime ban on compensation for athletes outside scholarships, is meant to allow the players to profit in a system where colleges, coaches, and corporations have been cashing in for decades. The change will permit college athletes to have professional agents and get paid for things like endorsing products on social-media posts, signing autographs, having their likeness used in video games, and starting a new company or even a nonprofit organization.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In less than a month, new laws in seven states will effectively pierce the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s ban on paying student-athletes — one of the starkest shifts in big-time college sports in a century.

Starting in July, colleges in those states will be barred from prohibiting their athletes from earning money based on their affiliation with sports. The new laws, which fly in the face of the NCAA’s longtime ban on compensation for athletes outside scholarships, is meant to allow the players to profit in a system where colleges, coaches, and corporations have been cashing in for decades. The change will permit college athletes to have professional agents and get paid for things like endorsing products on social-media posts, signing autographs, having their likeness used in video games, and starting a new company or even a nonprofit organization.

But the shift to allow students to monetize their names, images, or likenesses (or NIL) has not come easily and will likely not proceed without some uncertainty and confusion. While states began to pass laws in the fall of 2019, the NCAA has yet to release rules about how they will monitor the process and what kinds of deals will be acceptable. Some form of regulatory guidance or waiver process could be released later this month, when the NCAA could release new rules on limits for such arrangements and how they will be reported.

It’s unclear whether the NCAA will be able to make policy that jibes with all of the new laws, the specifics of which vary considerably. So colleges are moving cautiously to prepare for the change without knowing entirely what their coaches and athletic departments can or can’t do in helping athletes earn money.

“Everybody is floundering trying to figure out what is going on,” said Welch Suggs, an associate professor of journalism at the University of Georgia, who is an expert in college athletics and a former reporter for The Chronicle. “Normally, the NCAA provides guidance, but colleges aren’t getting jack,” he said.

Suggs said his biggest concern is the proliferation of small companies popping up to earn their own profits by helping young and sometimes impressionable students. “This is a level of chaos that college sports is not ready to deal with,” he said.

The new NIL laws will take effect next month in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, and New Mexico. Nebraska’s law isn’t mandatory until 2023, but colleges can allow NIL deals at any time before that.

Two major programs aren’t waiting to see what the NCAA comes up with.

At the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, various schools and colleges are developing “pop-up” courses that will focus on “entrepreneurship and skills to build brands and businesses.” The classes will be available to all students. Athletes can also get mentoring through an existing life-skills program at the university.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nebraska has also hired Opendorse, a social media and marketing company formed in Lincoln in 2012 to work with professional athletes. The company will not be offering deals to athletes, but will advise them on how to evaluate offers and get the most out of their marketing potential.

“We are putting programming in place based on our best knowledge of what we think the final outcome will be,” said Garrett Klassy, Nebraska’s senior deputy athletic director.

The University of Tennessee at Knoxville is taking a similar approach by developing a minor in entrepreneurship through the college of business and hiring the sports-marketing agency Altius to provide advice and guidance to athletes.

But it’s not just the students who will need education, said Andrew Donovan, the senior associate athletics director for regulatory affairs at Tennessee. Coaches will need guidance on what they can say during recruiting, he said, and athletic boosters need to be informed about limits on making arrangements with students.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both Nebraska and Tennessee are counting on their programs as a good way to recruit top-notch athletes. “We can’t go out and hire marketing agencies to help students,” Klassy said, “but if we have these resources available to students, that gives us an edge.”

The lack of guidance from the NCAA, which has in recent decades resisted efforts for Division I athletes to be paid, has left many issues unresolved. Meanwhile, members of Congress have drafted bills that would set a standard NIL policy nationwide, but none of them are likely to be passed before July 1.

In addition to the seven state laws going into effect in July, another nine states have passed NIL bills that will be enacted between January 2022 and September 2025.

The new state laws are “a first step into removal of economic restrictions for athletes so they can do things other students do,” said Victoria Jackson, a sports historian and clinical assistant professor at Arizona State University who also competed in distance running in college and professionally.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the past, the NCAA has disallowed students to accept money for anything that might be even remotely related to their athletic participation in the name of preserving amateurism. But that has led to absurd restrictions, Jackson said, that punish athletes for being entrepreneurial.

One example is Ryan Trahan, a cross-country runner at Texas A&M, who was temporarily suspended from participating in his sport because of YouTube videos promoting his own water-bottle company that he started before college. After widespread media attention, Trahan was given a waiver to continue competing, but only if his videos did not “use or reference his participation in intercollegiate athletics or his status as a student-athlete at Texas A&M.”

The National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics, the nation’s other major college sports association, has already developed rules and a framework for name, image, and likeness deals, Jackson said, showing that “the sky will not fall.”

The new laws are also just the latest in a series of legal and legislative actions to loosen the NCAA’s control over compensation and support for athletes. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the case NCAA v. Alston, challenging the association’s limit on the amount of education-related benefits that colleges can provide to athletes.

ADVERTISEMENT

B. David Ridpath, an associate professor of sports business at Ohio University, said the NCAA’s big worry is that they will lose their leverage over the students who bring in all the revenue for the colleges and the association.

Ridpath, a longtime advocate for reforming the NCAA, said the association and institutions argue that sponsorship opportunities will distract the athletes from focusing on their sport. Removing limits on educational benefits, especially for big-time football and basketball programs, could lead to an arms race among institutions and cuts in other sports.

But the association has adapted to equally large changes in the past, he said, and the public appetite for college sports is unquenchable.

“At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what happens,” he said, “we will all still watch the games. We’ll adjust.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Athletics Political Influence & Activism Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin