Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Finance

George Mason Faculty Demands Review of University’s Agreements With Donors

By Peter Schmidt May 5, 2016
Fairfax, Va.
D. Bruce Johnsen, a law professor at George Mason U., argued on Wednesday against a Faculty Senate resolution criticizing a donation to the law school by the Charles Koch Foundation. The resolution, he said, is “just a thinly veiled attempt to tell a lie and repeat it again and again.”
D. Bruce Johnsen, a law professor at George Mason U., argued on Wednesday against a Faculty Senate resolution criticizing a donation to the law school by the Charles Koch Foundation. The resolution, he said, is “just a thinly veiled attempt to tell a lie and repeat it again and again.”Essdras M. Suarez for The Chronicle

The controversy surrounding George Mason University’s relationship with donors escalated on Wednesday, as its Faculty Senate called for the suspension of an agreement between the law school and the Charles Koch Foundation that has divided many professors here.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

D. Bruce Johnsen, a law professor at George Mason U., argued on Wednesday against a Faculty Senate resolution criticizing a donation to the law school by the Charles Koch Foundation. The resolution, he said, is “just a thinly veiled attempt to tell a lie and repeat it again and again.”
D. Bruce Johnsen, a law professor at George Mason U., argued on Wednesday against a Faculty Senate resolution criticizing a donation to the law school by the Charles Koch Foundation. The resolution, he said, is “just a thinly veiled attempt to tell a lie and repeat it again and again.”Essdras M. Suarez for The Chronicle

The controversy surrounding George Mason University’s relationship with donors escalated on Wednesday, as its Faculty Senate called for the suspension of an agreement between the law school and the Charles Koch Foundation that has divided many professors here.

Last week the Senate passed a resolution expressing “deep concerns” with plans to rename the law school for the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, and protesting the university administration’s failure to disclose more about the agreement. On Wednesday it took an even more aggressive stance. The Senate voted 25 to 12 to call on the university’s leaders to put the agreement, which also involved an anonymous donor, on hold to subject it to more review. The Senate also called for greater oversight of such deals.

“We need to stand up for our rights,” David L. Kuebrich, an associate professor of English and a Faculty Senate member, said in urging his colleagues to pass the measure, which he characterized as written to ensure that their institution conforms with the American Association of University Professors’ standards dealing with donor agreements. He denounced the process by which the university approved the agreement with the law school’s donors, who pledged $30 million for scholarships over several years, as “too rushed — maybe deliberately so.”

Citing a provision in the agreement that has especially aroused faculty opposition — a requirement that the donors be notified if the university replaces the law school’s current dean, Henry N. Butler — Mr. Kuebrich said “donors should have nothing to do with faculty.”

In a separate voice vote, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a motion to request that Ángel Cabrera, George Mason’s president, and Tom Davis, rector of the university’s Board of Visitors, answer a series of questions betraying suspicion of the agreement. One of them asked what the university would do if the anonymous donor cut off the pledged funds before handing all of the money over.

A ‘Hate-Filled’ Resolution

In response to Wednesday’s Faculty Senate votes, Renell Wynn, a university spokeswoman, issued a statement that said George Mason “appreciates the valuable feedback” the Senate offered and is committed to promoting diversity and not being aligned with any single ideological position. She also said, however, that “this gift provides $30 million for scholarships, and that money will help hundreds of students attend law school — students who otherwise might not have had that chance.”

If this was a gift from George Soros to create the Harry Blackmun Law School, we wouldn’t even be here today.

“That is why this gift is so important to Mason,” she went on, “and why we believe we should continue to move forward.”

A few Faculty Senate members from the law school spoke out against the proposals in harsh terms. D. Bruce Johnsen took issue with Mr. Kuebrich’s assertions that the Koch Foundation’s past contributions to the university have led to accusations that Koch-financed programs there are involved in conservative indoctrination and lobbying. “This is just a thinly veiled attempt to tell a lie and repeat it again and again,” Mr. Johnsen said.

A second law professor, Lloyd Cohen, called Mr. Kuebrich’s resolution “hate-filled” and “an unprecedented assault on the academic freedom of one unit of our university.” Arguing that the measure had been motivated by a desire to squelch speech viewed as conservative, Mr. Cohen said, “if this was a gift from George Soros to create the Harry Blackmun Law School, we wouldn’t even be here today.”

The name change would lend credibility to judicial opinions and public statements which fanned the flames of homophobia and transphobia.

More than 30 student groups signed a statement criticizing the proposed renaming of the law school as undermining the university’s efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. Speaking to the Faculty Senate, Geoffrey Payne, a junior who is a spokesman for the student group Pride Alliance, argued that, as a gay and transgender student, he would “feel less safe at Mason because the name change would lend credibility to judicial opinions and public statements which fanned the flames of homophobia and transphobia.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Samantha Parsons, a senior who has been president of the group GMU Student Power, reiterated her group’s demand that all of the university’s grant agreements and memorandums of understanding with private donors “be made transparent and public.” She denounced the proposed law-school name change as “a symptom of a much deeper problem: undue donor influence and our university’s lack of consultation with important university stakeholders, such as faculty and students.”

Overblown Fears

In a “Dear Colleague” letter sent to the Faculty Senate last week, President Cabrera characterized much of the criticism of the agreement for the law-school gift as based on misunderstanding, and argued that fears of donors’ influence had been overblown.

“Our donors understand that, no matter how generous they may be, they will have no authority whatsoever in our faculty selection and promotion processes, our student admissions, or our curricular choices. If that’s not acceptable to them, we simply decline the gifts,” Mr. Cabrera wrote.

His letter said philanthropy plays an increasingly important role at public universities as a result of the continuous decline in their public support, but it remains “a very small percentage of our budget,” accounting for about 5 percent of its $920 million in spending for the 2017 fiscal year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Citing a New York Times analysis that estimated that the Charles Koch Foundation had given $50 million to the university over the last decade, he said, “To put things in perspective, that would amount to about 0.6 percent of our average annual budget over this period.”

The suggestion that gifts of this magnitude can shape the ideology of the largest public research university in Virginia is far-fetched, to say the least.

“The suggestion that gifts of this magnitude can shape the ideology of the largest public research university in Virginia is far-fetched, to say the least,” he wrote.

Calling the Charles Koch Foundation “one of our most consistent and generous donors,” and observing that George Mason lags behind peer institutions in terms of the share of its finances derived from philanthropy, he said, “Our problem is not that we receive too many gifts, but that we don’t receive enough.”

ADVERTISEMENT

President Cabrera’s letter acknowledged that some faculty members find some of Justice Scalia’s opinions “objectionable and even personally offensive.” But the president said the university is not renaming the law school for him based on any agreement with his views.

Rather, he said, “we are recognizing a man who served our country at the highest level of government for 30 years and who many experts of diverse ideological persuasions — from faculty colleagues in our law school, to his peers on the Supreme Court, to the president of the United States — consider to have been a great jurist who had a profound impact in the legal field.”

Rejecting a gift based on a disagreement with Justice Scalia’s opinions, he said, “would be inconsistent with our values of diversity and freedom of thought.”

Correction (05/05/2016, 12:35 p.m.): This article originally referred to Renell Wynn as a man. Ms. Wynn is a woman. The article has been corrected accordingly.

Peter Schmidt writes about affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. Contact him at peter.schmidt@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the May 13, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations Gender
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Peter Schmidt
Peter Schmidt was a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He covered affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. He is a co-author of The Merit Myth: How Our Colleges Favor the Rich and Divide America (The New Press, 2020).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

George Mason’s Plans to Honor Scalia Spark Protests Over the University’s Direction

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin