Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Is the ‘Trump Effect’ Scaring Away Prospective International Students?

By Vimal Patel November 13, 2018
1112 Open Doors
The Chronicle

The number of new international students enrolled in American higher education in the fall of 2017 declined 6.6 percent from the previous year, according to a report released on Tuesday. The data solidify an emerging trend — they come on the heels of a 3-percent decline the prior year — and raise concerns about the desire of prospective international students to study in the United States.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The number of new international students enrolled in American higher education in the fall of 2017 declined 6.6 percent from the previous year, according to a report released on Tuesday. The data solidify an emerging trend — they come on the heels of a 3-percent decline the prior year — and raise concerns about the desire of prospective international students to study in the United States.

Some observers have pegged at least part of the blame for the slowdown on the “Trump effect.” The combination of policies and rhetoric from the 45th president, the thinking goes, are making international students reconsider coming to the United States amid a political climate hostile to globalism.

But the organizations behind the annual “Open Doors” report — the Institute of International Education and the U.S. State Department — play down that narrative. It’s more complicated, they note, and the data reflect the choices of students who were probably considering colleges the year before Trump took office.

The primary culprits, they say, are the rising cost of American higher education; the scaleback of government-funded programs in some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, that encouraged study abroad; and stiffer competition for international students from other countries.

“The international-education consumer is always concerned about access, diversity, quality, cost, safety,” said Allan E. Goodman, president of the institute. “The biggest new development is there are real competitor countries out there that we’ve never had before. The list of top 100 universities in the world a decade ago were all British or American. Now there are a dozen international universities that are not American or British.”

Colleges rely on international students for tuition dollars and diversity. In an increasingly interconnected world, foreign students help expose American students to new cultures and customs. International students also have a broad financial impact. In 2017 they contributed $42.4 billion to the American economy through tuition, housing, and other expenses, according to the Department of Commerce.

The chart below shows the number of students enrolling for the first time at a American college or university over the last six academic years.

Different Nations, Different Factors

There were some bright spots, however. The overall number of international students in the United States increased by 1.5 percent, to a record 1.09 million. That rise was driven by an extension of Optional Practical Training, a program that allows students to stay on to work in the United States.

Students in science and engineering fields can now stay in the United States for 36 months instead of just 12 under an Obama-era extension of the program, making study in America a far more desirable option for students, and easing the concerns of employers worried about quick turnover. The number of students taking advantage of this benefit increased by 15.8 percent, to more than 200,000.

No one theory can explain all the data, said Rahul Choudaha, executive vice president for global engagement and research at Studyportals, a company that recruits international students online. He noted that the four countries that send the most students to the United States each have unique explanations for their slowdowns in growth or outright declines.

India is highly price-sensitive, so the cost of American higher education might be a barrier amid the rupee’s devaluation. Growth has decelerated in China, and Chinese parents are rethinking the value of the United States as an education destination. China and India saw increases of 3.6 percent and 5.4 percent, respectively, in their numbers of students studying in the United States, according to the report. Those figures represent slowdowns from recent years.

In Saudi Arabia, which had 44,432 students in the United States in the fall of 2017, a 15-percent decline from the year before, the pullback of support for study abroad is having an effect, Choudaha said. In South Korea, which had 54,555 students in the United States, a 7-percent drop from the prior year, the economy is strong and the population is shrinking.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Top 10 Sources of International Students
These nations sent the most students to the United States in both the 2016-17 and 2017-18 academic years. From five of the nations, overall enrollments in the United States were down.

Nation2016-17 students2017-18 studentsChange
China 350,755 363,341 3.6%
India 186,267 196,271 5.4%
South Korea 58,663 54,555 -7.0%
Saudi Arabia 52,611 44,432 -15.5%
Canada 27,065 25,909 -4.3%
Vietnam 22,438 24,325 8.4%
Taiwan 21,516 22,454 4.4%
Japan 18,780 18,753 -0.1%
Mexico 16,835 15,468 -8.1%
Brazil 13,089 14,620 11.7%

A ‘Sense of Pessimism’

But Choudaha is also very curious about students’ perceptions of studying in the United States in the age of Trump.

“There is one common thread that runs across all international students,” he said. “That thread is about safety and the perception of succeeding in the destination where they’re going.”

The current political environment is “unparalleled,” he added, and a “sense of pessimism” is making international students reconsider the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is some evidence that this is the case. Nearly one in three prospective international students surveyed said they had less interest in studying in the United States because of the political climate, according to a report last year by Royall & Company, a division of EAB (formerly the Education Advisory Board). The students’ most cited reason: the Trump administration.

The slowdown in international students is especially harmful to regional public universities, where the fast pace of nonresident tuition increases in the last five to eight years has eroded the value proposition they’ve traditionally offered to international students, Choudaha said.

Colleges are entering a third wave of recruitment strategy, he said. The first, before the 2008 economic crisis, was “sit and wait, and the students will come.” The second was becoming more proactive about recruiting. Now colleges will have to invest in international students’ experiences, so as to bolster word-of-mouth advertising.

“As costs keep increasing and competition keeps increasing,” Choudaha said, “institutions cannot just rely that students will naturally come to them. They have to provide better support services.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Vimal Patel covers graduate education. Follow him on Twitter @vimalpatel232, or write to him at vimal.patel@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the November 23, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Patel_Vimal.jpg
About the Author
Vimal Patel
Vimal Patel, a reporter at The New York Times, previously covered student life, social mobility, and other topics for The Chronicle of Higher Education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin