Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

MIT Offers Harsh Words for Saudi Arabia, but Stops Short of Cutting Financial Ties

By Steven Johnson February 6, 2019
Mohammed bin Salman (left), crown prince of Saudi Arabia, greets the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rafael Reif (right), during a visit to the campus in March 2018. Standing at the far right is Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, widely believed to be a key member of the crew that killed Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul’s Saudi Arabian consulate.
Mohammed bin Salman (left), crown prince of Saudi Arabia, greets the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rafael Reif (right), during a visit to the campus in March 2018. Standing at the far right is Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, widely believed to be a key member of the crew that killed Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul’s Saudi Arabian consulate.Bandar Algaloud, Getty Images

Updated (2/6/2019, 3:11 p.m.) with comment from a faculty critic.

After a monthslong review of its partnerships with Saudi Arabia, the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on Wednesday condemned the kingdom’s abuses but said MIT should not cut ties with it or its affiliates.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Mohammed bin Salman (left), crown prince of Saudi Arabia, greets the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rafael Reif (right), during a visit to the campus in March 2018. Standing at the far right is Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, widely believed to be a key member of the crew that killed Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul’s Saudi Arabian consulate.
Mohammed bin Salman (left), crown prince of Saudi Arabia, greets the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rafael Reif (right), during a visit to the campus in March 2018. Standing at the far right is Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, widely believed to be a key member of the crew that killed Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul’s Saudi Arabian consulate.Bandar Algaloud, Getty Images

Updated (2/6/2019, 3:11 p.m.) with comment from a faculty critic.

After a monthslong review of its partnerships with Saudi Arabia, the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on Wednesday condemned the kingdom’s abuses but said MIT should not cut ties with it or its affiliates.

In a letter to the campus, the president, L. Rafael Reif, accepted the recommendations of a report by Richard K. Lester, associate provost for international partnerships, despite protests from the MIT community.

Reif’s letter attempts to stake out a middle ground. It levels harsh criticism at Saudi Arabia’s abuses, in particular the murder of the Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi dissident, but accepts Lester’s recommendations to preserve relationships. It places much of the responsibility for reconsidering partnerships on faculty members, some of whom will join staff members and students on an ad hoc committee to further examine the question.

“On one hand, we have the behavior of the regime,” Reif said in an interview with The Chronicle. “It may appear that the solution is pretty simple: Just disengage and be done with it.” But most of the university’s partnerships with the kingdom are faculty-led research projects, Reif said, and a wholesale severance of ties could intrude on faculty autonomy.

“We have to be very careful on how we do that, and where we do that,” Reif said, “which is why we need faculty engagement to figure that out.”

The institute will help faculty members who wish to disengage from research projects, the administration said. None have asked to do so yet, according to The Boston Globe.

MIT’s review also weighed “the challenge of working in a nation so out of step with our commitment to inclusion and free expression, and our community’s deep sense of revulsion at actions of the Saudi regime,” Reif wrote, echoing language in Lester’s report.

MIT’s response offers the latest example of a university confronting the side effects of its global entanglements, and the apparent inescapability of heated geopolitical questions. Since 2011 American institutions have received at least $62 million in gifts and contracts from Saudi entities. A few, like Harvard University, Babson College, and the University of New Haven, have drawn further scrutiny either for the scale of accepted gifts or for the unusual depth of certain partnerships.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many of those partnerships have inspired calls to cut ties with the kingdom following Khashoggi’s murder and human-rights abuses in the war in Yemen. The U.S. Senate in December voted to end American support for the war, and to condemn the Saudi crown prince for Khashoggi’s killing.

‘Moral Money Laundering’

Lester’s preliminary report, released in December, drew comments and criticism from 123 people, including 42 faculty members, 23 students, and dozens of staff members and alumni.

It’s tough to classify comments as simply “for” or “against” Saudi partnerships, Lester said. Many supported some recommendations but not others. But his report shows that roughly three-quarters of both faculty and nonfaculty respondents were at least generally opposed to his recommendations to maintain ties. Twenty-four of the 42 faculty members were “strongly opposed,” he wrote.

Jonathan A. King, an emeritus professor of biology at MIT and an activist with Massachusetts Peace Action, was one of the critics. “I wasn’t surprised” by the recommendations, he said. “They’re very well written, but the conclusion is incorrect.” The institute’s arrangements are “driven not by intellectual content, but by the money,” he said, and they help legitimize a military regime.

ADVERTISEMENT

King said both faculty members and administrators should take a harder line. If an MIT researcher wants to study renewable energy, for instance, she can find funds outside of Saudi entities like Saudi Aramco, the oil company.

Lester’s final report grapples with some of those arguments. Some worried MIT was sacrificing its reputation for its financial interests. “MIT’s name must continue to stand for something higher than shallow pragmatism,” one comment read. But MIT’s activities with Saudi Arabia account for roughly 0.2 percent of the institute’s operating budget, Lester wrote. Last fiscal year, Saudi-government entities and universities sponsored about $7.2 million in MIT research, supporting 48 principal investigators.

In his first report, Lester argued that state-owned enterprises like Saudi Aramco are too distantly related to the kingdom’s abuses to consider disrupting partnerships. Some commenters contended that “it is not possible to distinguish government agencies from the person of the crown prince” and that the partnerships constituted “moral money laundering.”

Commenters disagreed over whether teaming up with “progressive” modernizing projects benefited Saudi citizens and people at MIT. Some argued that MIT’s prominence gave it leeway to set an example and cut ties. “Views regarding the practical impact of a cutoff of MIT activity are inherently speculative” and would require further study, Lester wrote in response.

We must not allow ourselves to be defined by our utility to any sovereign state or to any other organization.

But the institute should take pains to condemn the kingdom’s actions, Lester continued. “We must not allow ourselves to be defined by our utility to any sovereign state or to any other organization,” he wrote, “and we may sometimes need to take exceptional measures to avoid this. This is one such case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Some commenters described their own experiences with discrimination on trips to Saudi Arabia. In at least one case, Lester wrote, “full participation in the project required some participants to hide certain aspects of their identity,” and female researchers “were not accorded the same civil rights as their male MIT faculty colleagues.” In cases where future travel to the kingdom involves multiple researchers, he said, the principal investigator should provide reviewing committees a written explanation “of why such restrictions should be tolerated, and a plan for managing them. In general, such cases will not pass muster.”

The crisis sparked by Khashoggi’s assassination touched MIT in a “disturbing” way, Lester wrote in his December report. A photo circulated of the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, visiting the institute in March. One of the prince’s aides, visible in the background, was later implicated in Khashoggi’s murder.

MIT is not among the top recipients of Saudi funding. But it has a longstanding relationship with Saudi Aramco, which last March allocated $25 million for MIT’s research in renewable energy and artificial intelligence.

Reif expects MIT’s ad hoc committee to finish its deliberations in September.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are globally engaged,” Reif said. “This is a kind of situation that went beyond the pale for many of us. But how do we actually engage, how do we allow faculty to engage with good people in countries that have regimes that act in a way that we don’t approve?”

“That to me is a very serious question that a globally engaged institution has to answer,” he said, “and we are in the process of answering that for ourselves, and perhaps even for others as well.”

Follow Steven Johnson on Twitter at @stetyjohn, or email him at steve.johnson@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the February 15, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Steven Johnson
Steven Johnson is an Indiana-born journalist who’s reported stories about business, culture, and education for The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Washington Post, and The Atlantic.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Saudi Partnerships Are Too Valuable to Give Up, MIT Report Concludes
After the Killing of a Journalist, Colleges Confront Their Saudi Ties
Why a Saudi Prince’s Visit to Harvard and MIT Drew Protests

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin