Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Events and Insights:
    Leading in the AI Era
    Chronicle Festival On Demand
    Strategic-Leadership Program
Sign In
Free Expression

Most Americans Oppose Laws That Curtail Professors’ Classroom Speech

By Carolyn Kuimelis October 17, 2022
Gov. Ron DeSantis, after signing Florida HB 7 in April. The law places limits on lessons about race and identity.
Gov. Ron DeSantis after signing Florida HB 7, which regulates teaching on race and identity.Daniel A. Varela, Miami Herald, AP

Most Americans oppose laws that regulate how professors are allowed to speak about certain topics in college classrooms. Still, nearly one-third of people — across the political spectrum — believe that professors have too much freedom to speak their minds in the classroom.

The results come from a new YouGov poll, which found that only 19 percent of U.S. adults support these laws. That number is higher among Republicans; 30 percent say the government should be able to regulate professors’ classroom speech. And 50 percent of Republicans say professors have too much freedom to express themselves in class. Older and more educated Americans are the most likely to oppose these laws, which is true among both Democrats and Republicans.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Most Americans oppose laws that regulate how professors are allowed to speak about certain topics in college classrooms. Still, nearly one-third of people — across the political spectrum — believe that professors have too much freedom to speak their minds in the classroom.

The results come from a new YouGov poll, which found that only 19 percent of U.S. adults support these laws. That number is higher among Republicans; 30 percent say the government should be able to regulate professors’ classroom speech. And 50 percent of Republicans say professors have too much freedom to express themselves in class. Older and more educated Americans are the most likely to oppose these laws, which is true among both Democrats and Republicans.

The findings reflect a sample of 7,556 U.S. adults who answered an online survey this month about campus free speech. YouGov says the respondents “were weighted to be representative of the U.S. population, based on gender, age, race, education, U.S. census region, and political party.”

Jeremy C. Young, a senior manager with the free-expression advocacy group PEN America, said the study’s main finding is consistent with what previous polls have shown: People who want to regulate the speech of instructors make up “a tiny minority.”

That fewer younger people were opposed to government regulation of professors’ classroom speech indicates to him that there is a need for greater social education about the importance of free expression on college campuses.

“We think that the decline in support for free speech among young people and college students primarily comes from the left,” Young said. These students often think of free speech as a tool that’s used against social- and racial-justice movements, according to Young. But there is also a “sliver of opposition” to free expression from students on the right, he said, who see it as an excuse for college professors to express their liberal views in class.

Over the past two years, Republican-backed bills have increasingly taken aim at the discussion of race, racism, and gender in public-college classrooms. The laws often purport to target the teaching of critical race theory, an academic concept explaining how racism is embedded in law and policy, which has become a political punching bag for the right.

The State of Florida recently argued in a court filing that professors’ in-class instruction at public colleges is “government speech” and therefore fair game to be regulated by state lawmakers.

This year, bills attempting to curb diversity training and limit classroom discussion of “divisive issues” in higher ed have been introduced and passed at higher rates than last year, according to PEN America, which began tracking such bills in January 2021.

ADVERTISEMENT

An analysis from August found that in 2022, 39 percent of the introduced bills — what the group calls educational gag orders — have targeted higher ed, compared with 30 percent last year. Among those passed this year are:

  • Florida’s HB 7, which bars public colleges from teaching material that “espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels” an individual to believe in certain ideas about race, sex, privilege, and national origin, and requires instruction to be consistent with a list of principles of “individual freedom.”
  • South Dakota’s HB 1012, which bans public colleges from directing students or employees, in a training or classroom setting, to adopt certain ideas related to “divisive concepts,” such as “that an individual, by virtue of their race, color, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously.”
  • Tennessee’s SB 2290, which bans public colleges from including similar “divisive concepts” related to race, sex, and privilege in “seminars, workshops, trainings, and orientations.”

The bills introduced this year are also “strikingly more punitive,” according to the PEN report. Many propose monetary fines and disciplinary action, and allow lawsuits by individuals who feel they have been punished for not accepting “divisive concepts.”

The YouGov survey also asked about people’s perception of professors’ speech and students’ speech. Sixteen percent of respondents said they thought professors had “far too much” freedom to speak their minds in the classroom, while just 7 percent said the same about students.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Political Influence & Activism Free Speech
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Carolyn Kuimelis
Carolyn Kuimelis is a reporting intern at The Chronicle. Follow her on Twitter @CKuimelis, or email her at carolyn.kuimelis@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo-based illustration of two hands shaking with one person's sleeve a $100 bill and the other a graduated cylinder.
Controversial Bargains
Are the Deals to Save Research Funding Good for Research?
Illustration depicting a scale or meter with blue on the left and red on the right and a campus clock tower as the needle.
Newly Updated
Tracking Trump’s Higher-Ed Agenda
Illustration of water tap with the Earth globe inside a small water drop that's dripping out
Admissions & Enrollment
International Students Were Already Shunning U.S. Colleges Before Trump, New Data Show
Photo-based illustration of former University of Virginia Jim Ryan against the university rotunda building.
'Surreal and Bewildering'
The Plot Against Jim Ryan

From The Review

Jill Lepore, professor of American History and Law, poses for a portrait in her office at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Monday, November 4, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Why Jill Lepore Nearly Quit Harvard
By Evan Goldstein
Illustration of a sheet of paper with redaction marks in the shape of Florida
The Review | Opinion
Secret Rules Now Govern What Can Be Taught in Florida
By John W. White
German hygienist Sophie Ehrhardt checks the eye color of a Romani woman during a racial examination.
The Review | Essay
An Academic Prize’s Connection to Nazi Science
By Alaric DeArment

Upcoming Events

CHE-CI-WBN-2025-12-02-Analytics-Workday_v1_Plain.png
What’s Next for Using Data to Support Students?
Element451_Leading_Plain.png
What It Takes to Lead in the AI Era
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group Subscriptions and Enterprise Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin