Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Government

New Players Could Be in Line to Receive Federal Student Aid

By Kelly Field July 2, 2015

Students may soon be able to use Pell Grants to attend coding boot camps and enroll in MOOCs and other nontraditional programs under an experiment that the Education Department is considering conducting.

The pilot project, which has been in the works for several months, would let colleges contract out entire programs to education-technology companies and retain the programs’ eligibility for federal grants and loans. Colleges are now limited in how much of a program they can outsource.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Students may soon be able to use Pell Grants to attend coding boot camps and enroll in MOOCs and other nontraditional programs under an experiment that the Education Department is considering conducting.

The pilot project, which has been in the works for several months, would let colleges contract out entire programs to education-technology companies and retain the programs’ eligibility for federal grants and loans. Colleges are now limited in how much of a program they can outsource.

If successful, the test could open the door to federal student aid for a host of ed-tech upstarts that offer alternatives to traditional degrees, such as badges and microcredentials. Beneficiaries could include providers of massive open online courses like edX and Udacity, and coding schools like General Assembly and Pluralsight.

Details of the experiment are still being worked out, including the thorny question of who would validate the partnerships — existing accreditors, new entrants, or both. On July 30 the department will bring together colleges, companies, and accreditors to discuss issues of quality control.

“They’re trying to sort out, What could this look like?” said Southern New Hampshire University’s president, Paul J. LeBlanc, who has just completed a three-month stint at the department as an adviser on the pilot, dubbed “Project Badger” (after badges). “There is still a lot of internal wrangling with how do we do this well, how do we prevent abuses,” he said.

A department official stressed that no decisions had been made on the pilot, which is known as an “experimental site,” but said the agency was encouraged by “the exciting work” being done on some campuses.

“We’re interested in encouraging more collaborations between institutions and new providers,” the official said.

Accommodating New Players

“Noninstitutional providers,” as the diverse mix of ed-tech companies are collectively known, have become popular with lawmakers, who see them as a way to get more students to earn a postsecondary credential more quickly and at a lower cost. Yet the companies, which don’t offer degrees and don’t rely on the credit hour, don’t fit the mold of traditional accreditation. Finding a way to accommodate them has become a priority for the Obama administration and congressional Republicans alike.

Partnerships between colleges and ed-tech companies have become more common in recent years, with agreements like the one between the University of New Haven and Galvanize, an unaccredited coding school, making national headlines. Still, most of the arrangements have been narrower, with colleges outsourcing their marketing or technology, but not their academic affairs.

That’s partly due to federal rules that bar colleges from outsourcing more than a quarter of a program’s instruction or training — 49.9 percent if the program is approved by an accreditor. Under the rules, programs that exceed those limits lose their ability to award federal aid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lifting the caps on outsourcing would pave the way for more partnerships, and allow third parties to play a bigger role in educating students at traditional colleges. As such, the pilot is likely to face pushback from faculty members worried about ceding academic control and from consumer advocates nervous about expanding the role of for-profit companies in higher education. It could also raise alarms among community colleges and some state comprehensive universities, which might lose students to the newly eligible programs.

But Michael B. Horn, a co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, said he expected the grumbling from faculty members to be muted, in part because the agreements can provide desperately needed revenue to struggling colleges.

“It will ultimately challenge the existing institutional model, but in many ways that is already under threat,” he said. A pilot “gives traditional institutions a window to transform themselves,” he said, “to experiment, and see what does and doesn’t work.”

Ben Miller, senior director for postsecondary education at the Center for American Progress and a frequent critic of for-profit colleges, said he was not worried about letting more companies into the federal student-aid system under a “controlled and supervised” experiment.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is the right way to approach letting new players into the system,” he said. “And if they produce good results, it makes sense to allow students to use their aid there.”

Still, not everyone is convinced that the government needs to intervene in the market. Richard Garrett, director of the Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, said he worried that federal subsidies could make the companies less efficient, less driven to innovate. He argued that it might be better to let the fledging companies evolve “without the crutch of public subsidies.”

“A lot of these experiments are young and unproven,” he said. “To me, it feels a bit premature and a bit faddish.”

Quality Control

The debate over opening up the student-aid system to new players comes as the department is preparing guidance for colleges that are seeking access to aid for competency-based programs under another pilot project.

ADVERTISEMENT

In both experiments, the department is trying to encourage innovation, while safeguarding the student-aid system from fraud and abuse. It’s a difficult balancing act, particularly because there’s disagreement about who should be in charge of quality control.

Some regional accreditors, including groups that represent New England and the West, have said they’re interested in expanding their purview to cover such partnerships. They argue that accreditors, as the original guardians of quality, are best positioned for the task.

“We need to be working within the changing landscape of higher education,” said Mary Ellen Petrisko, president of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges’ Senior College and University Commission.

Asked if accreditors might evaluate partnerships differently than they judge traditional colleges, Ms. Petrisko said no. “I don’t see this as a qualitatively different thing, as far as outcomes are concerned,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But others argued that the arrangements should be held to a higher standard, with a greater emphasis on student learning and labor-market outcomes.

“This could go wrong really quickly if you don’t have good quality assurances,” said Amy Laitinen, deputy director for higher education at New America.

Ms. Laitinen said she doubts whether the regional accreditors are up to the task, but is encouraged by their willingness to innovate.

Some lawmakers, meanwhile, are calling for the creation of alternative pathways to accreditation. This spring two U.S. senators — Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, and Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat — sought to add language to the budget blueprint for “a new outcome-based process for authorizing innovative higher-education providers.” Last year Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, introduced a bill that would leave the task to the states. The top Republican on the Senate education committee, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, has expressed interest in both approaches.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the department goes ahead with the pilot, it could be “a fertile testing ground for Congress” as it prepares to reauthorize the Higher Education Act, Ms. Laitinen said.

“It will be messy, and it will be hard to do it well,” she said. “But in some ways, that’s the point.”

Kelly Field is a senior reporter covering federal higher-education policy. Contact her at kelly.field@chronicle.com. Or follow her on Twitter @kfieldCHE.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin