Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Governance

North Carolina Has Ideas for Tempering Politics on Public-College Boards. Will They Go Anywhere?

By Eric Kelderman June 15, 2023
North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper and former University of North Carolina system presidents Tom Ross, left, and Margaret Spellings at a news conference
Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina with two former presidents of the UNC system, Thomas Ross and Margaret Spellings, who led a reform commission.Gary D. Robertson, AP

In many ways, the University of North Carolina system has become a poster child for troubled governance. In recent years, the system has been subject to a long list of conflicts between its politically appointed Board of Governors, the system’s administration, and its individual campuses.

Higher-education advocates in the state have blamed those tensions on the system’s board for dragging partisan politics into the board room. As some critics see it, board members have sought to enforce conservative ideals at the expense of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In many ways, the University of North Carolina system has become a poster child for troubled governance. In recent years, the system has been subject to a long list of conflicts between its politically appointed Board of Governors, the system’s administration, and its individual campuses.

Higher-education advocates in the state have blamed those tensions on the system’s board for dragging partisan politics into the board room. As some critics see it, board members have sought to enforce conservative ideals at the expense of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.

Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, created a commission last fall to recommend changes in university governance. Cooper’s goals were expansive: Repair the system’s oversight, and reduce what the governor and others see as the board’s political overreach.

“The UNC system is the envy of the nation for what we have built here,” Cooper said at the time. “But there are signs of trouble that come when all of its appointed leaders are chosen by too few — signs of undue political influence, bureaucratic meddling, and singularity of political thought.”

That group has now released a set of seven recommendations, including expanding membership on the system board from 24 to 32 or 36, allowing members of both parties in the General Assembly to make appointments to the board, and doubling the terms of those appointments, from four to eight years. The commission made similar recommendations for the Boards of Trustees for the system’s 16 universities: increasing their size from 15 to 17 members, doubling their terms, and making appointments bipartisan.

The UNC system is the envy of the nation ... But there are signs of trouble that come when all of its appointed leaders are chosen by too few.

The commission also called for the system’s board to stream its meetings live and record them, require lobbyists and elected officials to have a one-year “cooling-off period” between their political career and a board appointment, and create an academic center to study higher-education governance. A full report of the group’s work will be released in the coming weeks.

Jane Stancill, vice president for communications at the UNC system, said the Board of Governors already livestreams all their meetings.

Experts in higher-education governance gave high marks for the commission’s ideas, but they warned that there was little chance most of them would be enacted.

“The commission’s recommendations would address a number of governance concerns, including the partisan tensions and lack of transparency that are well-known issues in higher education in North Carolina,” Sondra N. Barringer, an assistant professor of higher education at Southern Methodist University, said in an email.

“I think it is unlikely that the Republican-controlled legislature will act on these,” Barringer said, “as it would weaken their power over higher-education governance in North Carolina.”

More Diversity

Thomas W. Ross, a former president of the UNC system and a co-chair of the commission, said state law requires the university’s governing boards to represent the state’s diversity.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the current system board and most campus boards fall short on that measure because most members are white men, while a majority of students in the system and across the state are women, Ross said.

A report on the demographics of the system’s governing bodies, from the College Crisis Initiative at Davidson College, found that three-quarters of the Board of Governors are men, along with two-thirds of university trustees. Women make up nearly 60 percent of students in the system, the report said, and a little more than half of the state’s population.

The institutional board of North Carolina State has only one female member, which is shocking to Margaret Spellings, another former president of the system and the commission’s other co-chair. “It is hard to look at the system’s largest institution and say it makes sense for only one woman to be on that board.”

It is hard to look at the system’s largest institution and say it makes sense for only one woman to be on that board.

More than three-quarters of the system board is white, compared with 62 percent of the state’s population and 55 percent of students at its public universities. Boards of Trustees for individual institutions are more diverse over all, the report found: Six of those boards, all at minority-serving campuses, have a non-white majority of members.

Politically, too, the system’s board is the least representative of the state: 64 percent of the board members are registered Republicans, compared with 30 percent of the state’s population.

ADVERTISEMENT

Henry Stoever, president of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said the commission’s recommendations have the potential to improve governance in North Carolina, particularly the measure to lengthen board terms to eight years. That would depoliticize the governance, he said, because board membership would not shift so quickly after a turnover in partisan control of state government.

Board members, too, would have more time to fully learn about their roles before their terms were up, said Stoever, allowing them to focus more on substantive issues of financial stability and student success.

Change May Take Time

Whatever the merits of the commission’s recommendations, North Carolina legislators have shown no willingness to lessen their grip on the state’s public universities.

In 2016 the Republican-controlled General Assembly removed the authority of the governor to appoint any institutional trustees just weeks before Cooper was sworn in to replace his Republican predecessor. The following year, lawmakers passed a bill reducing membership on the system’s Board of Governors from 32 to 24.

ADVERTISEMENT

A bill under consideration this year would expand the system board to 28 members. But it would also grant sole authority to legislative leaders to appoint those members, instead of having them elected by both the House and Senate, removing any bipartisan consideration.

This year, lawmakers have also drafted legislation requiring all of the state’s public colleges to seek a new institutional accreditor. The bill is a response to an inquiry by UNC-Chapel Hill’s accrediting agency, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges, into that campus’s Board of Trustees proposal to create a new School of Civic Life and Leadership on the flagship campus.

Ross said legislators should consider the recommendations, which encourage the kind of diversity of thought that many Republicans have argued for in other cases. In particular, he said, a center to study higher-education governance could make the state a national leader on this topic.

Spellings, who served as U.S secretary of education under President George W. Bush, said there was a strong consensus for the recommendations among the Republicans who participated on the commission. But the ideas may take time to be embraced by citizens and elected officials in the state, she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

That consensus apparently didn’t include Rep. John R. Bell IV, a Republican and majority leader in the state House of Representatives, who was listed as a member of the commission. Bell did not respond to a request for comment.

Bell didn’t attend any of the meetings or participate in any way, Spellings said: “We’re sorry he wasn’t there to give his thoughts.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance Law & Policy Assessment & Accreditation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin