Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
News

Sanctuary Campus

Some campuses consider ‘sanctuary’ status. But can they protect students?

By Eric Kelderman February 26, 2017
Sanctuary Campus FINAL
Illustration by Martín Elfman for The Chronicle

The Trump administration’s pledge to crack down on undocumented immigrants has spurred protests and demands that colleges shield their students. It has also led to a wave of confusion over how — or how aggressively — the administration will carry out that pledge.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Sanctuary Campus FINAL
Illustration by Martín Elfman for The Chronicle

The Trump administration’s pledge to crack down on undocumented immigrants has spurred protests and demands that colleges shield their students. It has also led to a wave of confusion over how — or how aggressively — the administration will carry out that pledge.

While colleges are bracing for uncertainty and conflicting messages in the months ahead, campus leaders are taking a variety of steps to support students who lack legal residency status. About a dozen colleges have declared their campuses “sanctuaries,” and many more are choosing to help undocumented students in other ways.

President Trump has said he would deport millions of immigrants who lack proper documentation. He has also, at times, said he would roll back protections provided by the Obama administration through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), which has allowed more than 740,000 immigrants to study and work in this country on two-year renewable terms. The uncertainty and possible loss of DACA status has created confusion for campus leaders and has led undocumented students and their supporters to circulate petitions asking hundreds of colleges to declare themselves sanctuaries for immigrants enrolled there.

Wesleyan University is among those that have adopted the label of “sanctuary campus” to signal disapproval of the president’s policies. Michael S. Roth, the president, says that means that Wesleyan will protect information about students who are not legal residents, and will not cooperate with federal immigration authorities unless they have a warrant to carry out arrests.

Nothing Wesleyan is doing puts it at odds with federal law, Mr. Roth says. His university has information about which students have legal-resident status, but that information is also protected by federal student-privacy laws and would not normally be shared with agencies or law-enforcement officials without some legal requirement to do so.

“We’re using the law as we think it is meant to be used” — to demand due process, Mr. Roth says.

In fact, Steven McDonald, general counsel at the Rhode Island School of Design and an expert on student privacy, said in an email that releasing student records without a student’s consent or a subpoena would violate federal law under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.

The National Immigration Law Center, meanwhile, has compiled a list of policy recommendations and a model resolution for colleges that wish to create a “safe zone” to protect undocumented students. Jessica Hanson, a fellow at the center who helped develop the guidelines, says the center wanted to avoid the term “sanctuary” because it had been politicized by those who oppose the movement to protect undocumented immigrants.

A backlash to the sanctuary-campus movement has grown among some state and federal lawmakers, who have threatened to punish colleges for protecting undocumented students. Other college presidents are concerned about the possible impact on their students but warn that the term is too broad and may imply a level of protection that the campus cannot actually provide.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Immigration lawyers with whom we have consulted have told us that this concept has no basis in law,” Princeton University’s president, Christopher L. Eisgruber, said in a statement. He said the university’s lawyers had advised that “colleges and universities have no authority to exempt any part of their campuses from the nation’s immigration laws.”

No college has pledged to actually defy or resist law-enforcement efforts, which could result in a civil offense, according to Ms. Hanson. Even the protection that many students have under the DACA program could be problematic, because it has given the government all the information they need to identify and locate those who have registered.

TAKEAWAY

Advocates of undocumented students debate ‘sanctuary’ status

  • Students and administrators across the country are concerned about the Trump administration’s promise to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.
  • Some colleges are responding by promising to be “sanctuaries” for such students, and to support their efforts to remain in the United States.
  • Groups like the National Immigration Law Center are providing alternative model actions and resolutions that colleges can adopt to support students.
  • Some college presidents warn that the term “sanctuary” may be misleading because it has no legal basis and may overpromise what the college can do.

David Oxtoby, president of Pomona College, has said he supports the goals of sanctuary campuses but does not use the term because of his institution’s limited legal authority. (See Commentary, below.) Instead, colleges like Pomona are promising to support students in ways within their authority, such as offering free legal counseling, awarding emergency grants for immigration and legal fees, and treating undocumented students the same as others for the purposes of admissions and financial aid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Oxtoby is also one of more than 600 college presidents who have signed a letter urging President Trump to continue the DACA program.

Wesleyan’s president, Mr. Roth, says he understands the concerns about overpromising but also thinks it’s important to take a strong stance against Mr. Trump’s calls for mass deportations. “I think the far greater danger is to not send an indication to the new administration that we would not cooperate with mass deportation,” he says.

The term “sanctuary” may be more of a political moniker than a legal designation, he acknowledges.

“The idea of mass deportation is also political,” he says, as is “using immigrants as scapegoats.

“And taking a stand against that is important.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 3, 2017, issue.
Read other items in The 2017 Trends Report.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Commentary: Islands Are Not the Answer

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin