Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
The Review

The Simplest Course I Ever Taught

By Paula Marantz Cohen January 21, 2018
The Simplest Course  I Ever Taught 1
James O’Brien for The Chronicle Review

In my 35 years of teaching English, I have come to see many undergraduates as skeptical learners, especially with regard to the humanities. Their initial response is to question and even resist what we want to teach them. “How much time will the reading take?” they ask. “Why do I have to do it?” “Will this be on the exam?”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In my 35 years of teaching English, I have come to see many undergraduates as skeptical learners, especially with regard to the humanities. Their initial response is to question and even resist what we want to teach them. “How much time will the reading take?” they ask. “Why do I have to do it?” “Will this be on the exam?”

The key to engaging these students is not a matter of how much reading we sling at them, but how strategically we assign and discuss the material. Consider the analogy of cooking a live frog: Put the frog in boiling water and he’ll jump out at once; gradually turn up the heat and he’ll stay put and get cooked. If I raise the heat on the reading in a course very slowly, students get cooked (i.e., hooked) without knowing it.

I call this pedagogy “slow teaching.” In the honor’s college at my university we have introduced a set of courses that employ this method. They look closely — and, by extension, slowly — at one major text or idea over the course of 10 weeks. Some examples: Nabokov’s Pale Fire, Ford’s The Searchers, Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, Jacobs’s The Death and Life of Great American Cities.

These courses have been a revelation. They have created a climate of joy in the classroom, allowing everyone to relax and savor the subject matter. They have also helped me to reassess the motives and methods of my past teaching. For most of my career, I felt obliged to be “comprehensive": to cram in as much material as possible over the course of a term. I directed my attention at students like myself — driven overachievers — and was dismissive of those for whom literature was a footnote to other things.

But good teaching is about abandoning this kind of vanity; it means seeing all students as equally valuable and capable of delight in the material. This requires slowing down — both to relieve the pressure of voluminous assignments and to allow time for students who are less immediately drawn to the subject matter to get their bearings.

This past fall, I took the slow teaching approach to a new level. It began when chatting with a group of students about Jane Austen. They all professed to love her, but as we continued to talk, I found that most knew her only through movie and television adaptations. They were a bright, curious group, but had found Austen’s writing, when they had tried to read her in high school and college courses, too dense and difficult. How sad this seemed to me. And so I decided to offer a one-credit course: “Reading Jane Austen Aloud.”

For an hour each week I read Pride and Prejudice to the class, stopping occasionally at the end of a chapter to explain a reference or supply a context: the meaning of “primogeniture” and “entail”; the lower status attached to being “in trade”; the difference between Bingley and Darcy’s class position. I never had such a rapt audience.

As the term progressed, I began assigning reading to be done at home. Those who had once been stymied by Austen’s language now said reading her had become much easier. During class, I began to stop reading aloud and spend longer periods discussing the characters and situations. The course began to be more like a traditional seminar, though the students seemed more personally engaged and gave me more insight than usual into their beliefs and values.

There was, for example, general support for Charlotte’s decision to marry Mr. Collins (“It’s better to be with a fool and have some control over your life than to work as a governess and be invisible in someone else’s house”), and sympathy for Mrs. Bennet (“Given the society of the time, it’s her job to get her daughters married, and she applies herself to it!”). Students saw Mr. Collins’s unwillingness to accept Elizabeth’s refusal of his marriage proposal as a form of sexual harassment.

These students were pragmatists, but they were also compassionate readers, able to go deeper than expected. In the end they could acknowledge Austen’s genius but also critique the limitations built into her historical moment.

ADVERTISEMENT

The course was a profoundly communal experience. It was the simplest course I ever taught but also among the best and certainly among the most pleasurable. Austen’s wit and insight made us laugh, and students found that ideas formed spontaneously as they listened to her wonderful sentences.

“Reading Jane Austen Aloud” was admittedly an extreme case of slow teaching. It required both confidence in the approach (which others might label lazy or condescending) and a certain kind of mastery (one must know the novel well and be cognizant of not only how to read it with fluency and verve but also how and when to explicate or contextualize). It takes a certain bravado to embrace simplicity and ease, especially when you have been bred to respect complexity and difficulty.

I believe that all coursework, even in practical, content-dense fields like engineering, would profit from a dose of slow teaching. For this to happen, we would have to honestly evaluate what is necessary in the curriculum and what is only there owing to tradition or pride in one’s own expertise. I am convinced that key concepts and texts will adhere better to memory and understanding if their presentation is slowed down — if we find a way to return to what first sparked our interest and delight in a given subject.

Ultimately, slow teaching, in whatever form it takes, is about reconnecting to the pleasure of a text or an idea, and of communing over it. Pleasure is a great motivator to learning.

Paula Marantz Cohen is dean of the Pennoni Honors College and a distinguished professor of English at Drexel University.

A version of this article appeared in the January 26, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Paula Marantz Cohen
Paula Marantz Cohen is a professor of English and dean of the honors college at Drexel University.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

A Jane Austen Education
What I’ve Learned in the Classroom
Alt-Right Jane Austen

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin