A proposal to change the tenure policy across the U. of Arkansas system has touched off fear among some faculty members. The university says the proposal is merely an effort to align with “current law and best practices.” The professors say making collegiality a criterion in faculty evaluations is an attack on academic freedom.Replay Photos/Getty Images
The University of Arkansas system is considering proposed changes in its tenure policy that could make it easier to fire professors and, faculty members say, chip away at academic freedom.
Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for less than $10/month.
Don’t have an account? Sign up now.
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.
If you need assistance, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com.
A proposal to change the tenure policy across the U. of Arkansas system has touched off fear among some faculty members. The university says the proposal is merely an effort to align with “current law and best practices.” The professors say making collegiality a criterion in faculty evaluations is an attack on academic freedom.Replay Photos/Getty Images
The University of Arkansas system is considering proposed changes in its tenure policy that could make it easier to fire professors and, faculty members say, chip away at academic freedom.
A key concern, they say, is language in the proposal that outlines when professors may be fired for cause. It includes a “pattern of disruptive conduct or unwillingness to work productively with colleagues.” That language, some faculty members say, effectively means collegiality — or the lack thereof — can be used as a reason to dismiss a professor.
Using collegiality as a criterion to evaluate faculty members has long been condemned by the American Association of University Professors.
A spokesman for the university system, Nate Hinkel, said in an email that the proposed changes were part of a broader effort in recent years to update the Board of Trustees’ policies so they align with “current law and best practices.” The general counsel’s office drafted the changes in the promotion and tenure policy, and sent them to the system’s campuses in mid-September to get feedback from faculty members and administrators, he wrote.
Changes will be made based on that input, but it’s unclear when the board will receive a final version for approval, Mr. Hinkel said. The board’s next meeting is scheduled for November 8-9.
ADVERTISEMENT
A former law professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock weighed in on the issue on his blog. “In the corporatized university, there is no room for faculty governance and less for freedom of thought,” wrote Richard Peltz-Steele, now a professor at the University of Massachusetts School of Law. “Faculty are expected to toe the line and make the widgets. That’s a frightening vision of the university.”
He also included a lengthy note that one of his former colleagues wrote, about how the proposal would imperil academic freedom and tenure. “If these changes are adopted,” wrote Joshua M. Silverstein, a professor of law at Arkansas, “the damage to the University of Arkansas will be wide-ranging and likely permanent.”
Mr. Peltz-Steele urged professors to push back. “What is happening at Arkansas, just one instance amid an alarming national trend, needs wider attention,” he wrote. “Simply put, an attack on academic freedom anywhere is an attack on academic freedom everywhere.”
Audrey Williams June is a senior reporter who writes about the academic workplace, faculty pay, and work-life balance in academe. Contact her at audrey.june@chronicle.com, or follow her on Twitter @chronaudrey.
Audrey Williams June is the news-data manager at The Chronicle. She explores and analyzes data sets, databases, and records to uncover higher-education trends, insights, and stories. Email her at audrey.june@chronicle.com, or follow her on Twitter @audreywjune.